Did this advance to a public hearing?
I didn't catch the end of the meeting, but from the discussion I assume this one went forward.
Most of the discussion was about where to direct the amenity contribution fee, not the actual development itself. There were some questions about who was going to operate the 10 below-market rental units, the stepping back of the building along Mason Street, logistics of garbage pickup across the bike lane, and whether or not the application should be sent to Heritage Advisory Panel due to proximity to other heritage assets (which it shouldn't, and I think that sentiment was quickly brushed away by other council members).