^ Yeah but now they own fee simply property in Rock Bay which I assume they will need to pay taxes on but will not have any income from allowing the site to be used for staging.
Sewage treatment in Victoria | McLoughlin Point Wastewater Treatment Plant
#4901
Posted 07 March 2017 - 09:16 AM
#4902
Posted 07 March 2017 - 09:18 AM
^ Yeah but now they own fee simply property in Rock Bay which I assume they will need to pay taxes on but will not have any income from allowing the site to be used for staging.
Article says CRD will lease that land. Pay the bands. Esquimalt and Songhees bands also get liason positions created for some of their members, paid for by CRD.
#4903
Posted 07 March 2017 - 09:34 AM
Article says CRD will lease that land. Pay the bands. Esquimalt and Songhees bands also get liason positions created for some of their members, paid for by CRD.
So they will lease the land and then not use it?!
#4904
Posted 07 March 2017 - 09:35 AM
So they will lease the land and then not use it?!
The article says the CRD will lease the land for a staging area. Not sure how they will use it, since barging is gone. Maybe steel equipment or rebar etc. will be stored there before it's moved to the plant site etc.
#4905
Posted 07 March 2017 - 09:40 AM
The article says the CRD will lease the land for a staging area. Not sure how they will use it, since barging is gone. Maybe steel equipment or rebar etc. will be stored there before it's moved to the plant site etc.
Ok thanks
#4906
Posted 07 March 2017 - 10:15 AM
Fee simple? So the natives could sell it or develop it and sell condos (not 99 year leasehold) once the CRD lease is done, assuming it is leased?
#4907
Posted 07 March 2017 - 10:59 AM
6. First Nations Support Agreements
The Core Area spans the traditional territory of the Lekwungen peoples, known today as Esquimalt Nation and Songhees Nation. As part of the Project and in recognition of the Crown's obligation to consult with the Esquimalt and Songhees Nations and the contribution of the Nations, including to the planning of the wastewater system, the CRD has entered into Support Agreements with the Esquimalt and Songhees Nations. All costs associated with the Support Agreements are included in the Control Budget for the Project.
Key terms of the agreements are:
- The CRD will lease Rock Bay from Matullia Holdings Limited Partnership, a partnership of the Esquimalt Nation and Songhees Nation, for use as a laydown area for four years.
- The CRD will create an Esquimalt Nation liaison position and a Songhees Nation liaison position for the four year term of the Project. The liaisons will assist the CRD and the contractors to ensure that the Nations continue to be informed and engaged during the Project and will provide support and guidance to the CRD and members of the Project Team with respect to cultural protocols between CRD and the Nations, including protocols that may apply in the event of the discovery of ancestral remains during construction.
- The CRD will contribute $480,000 to Xhamasung Holdings LLP, a corporation jointly owned by the Esquimalt Nation and Songhees Nation, for the upgrading and development of Westbay Village Marina and R.V. park.
- The CRD will cause its contractors to make meaningful efforts to train and employ members of both Nations during construction.
- The CRD will contribute to the legal, professional and administrative costs incurred by the Nations in respect of the Project and the Support Agreements.
- The CRD will make contributions to each Nation for improvements to their reserves and for the reinterment of
Aboriginal ancestors whose remains may be disturbed as a result of the construction of the Project.
agreed to work closely with the liaisons to foster ongoing engagement during construction and agreed to support a process for the reinterment of Aboriginal ancestors. Reaching an understanding in advance of construction will hopefully go some way to minimize the emotional upheaval in the event of the discovery of ancestral remains and as well, mitigate the risk of potential delays in construction. (pp 5-6)
https://crd.ca.legis...7F-A9D120C3673E
#4908
Posted 08 March 2017 - 04:12 PM
Today's 2-hour CRD sewage committee meeting video now uploaded for viewing. To jump to specific agenda items, click on link below the video screen. https://www.crd.bc.c...es/live-webcast
#4909
Posted 10 March 2017 - 06:16 AM
#4910
Posted 11 March 2017 - 09:16 AM
#4911
Posted 21 March 2017 - 05:26 AM
#4912
Posted 21 March 2017 - 06:54 AM
Good deal for them, for sure. Bringing former Harbour Authority CEO Curtis Grad into their organization is paying off.
I see their building, the former PCC office on Pandora is still for lease.
#4913
Posted 23 March 2017 - 08:51 AM
#4914
Posted 24 March 2017 - 06:30 AM
#4915
Posted 24 March 2017 - 06:33 AM
Duston Benton of Green Alliance, excerpt:
The oceans can tell us what’s wrong, but the solutions need to start somewhere else, so that we stop plastics from entering the marine environment in the first place. We need to radically change the way we design plastics, not the way we dispose of them.
,,,Whilst plastics are important materials, we need to stop designing products that are both materially inefficient and harmful to the environment.
Cleaning up the oceans is no solution to our plastic problem:
https://www.euractiv...lastic-problem/
#4916
Posted 26 March 2017 - 05:08 AM
Edited by JohnN, 26 March 2017 - 05:08 AM.
#4917
Posted 26 March 2017 - 05:48 AM
^
Desjardins said the board has been raising the tax levy incrementally for sewage to reduce overall costs and make sure there is enough money for capital and operational spending.
Does this statement confuse anyone else besides me? Can anyone tell me what it means?
#4918
Posted 26 March 2017 - 09:33 AM
^
Does this statement confuse anyone else besides me? Can anyone tell me what it means?
It is confusing and while I'm not sure what Desjardins means, I think it might be the sewage+sludge plant payment escalator tax introduced in 2013 (see image of table below), when municipalities introduced a charge against future treatment plant costs in order to avoid politically-unpalatable "sticker shock".
As well, the funding need to initiate the construction could be drawn from the accumulated pot of money on hand.
Anyway, thats my guess.
Edited by JohnN, 26 March 2017 - 09:34 AM.
#4919
Posted 26 March 2017 - 10:00 AM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users