Jump to content

      



























Photo

Sewage treatment in Victoria | McLoughlin Point Wastewater Treatment Plant


  • Please log in to reply
5673 replies to this topic

Poll: What do you think of the report $1.2 billion Dollar sewage treatment cost. (77 member(s) have cast votes)

What do you think of the report $1.2 billion Dollar sewage treatment cost.

  1. We need it and waited too long that is the cost of waiting too long! (65 votes [23.47%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 23.47%

  2. Local, Provincial, and Federal politicians will find a way to help cut down the price to property owners. (3 votes [1.08%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 1.08%

  3. Out of the question, too expensive for Greater Victoria. (122 votes [44.04%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 44.04%

  4. It expensive, but if we do nothing costs will only rise. (20 votes [7.22%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.22%

  5. We need to do it but greatly scale back the project. It has grwon out of hand. (34 votes [12.27%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 12.27%

  6. No opinion, I do not know enough about the project to say of the costs are out of line or not. (33 votes [11.91%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 11.91%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#4781 spanky123

spanky123
  • Member
  • 21,014 posts

Posted 15 December 2016 - 12:14 PM

Why didn't anybody know this would have to go to re-zoning? Meaning 'anybody' from the special board put together by the Province, the CRD sitting politicians and CRD staff or any/all 13 municipality politicians (91) and/or staff from each of the 13?  Out of all that brain-power and attention to the tiniest details how could this have been missed?  Makes me super-worried about other things that might have been missed.  Also, I wonder if the politicians at the CRD board would have voted the way they initially did (approve the plant) had they known it would have to go back for re-zoning?  The Mayor of Esquimalt included.   (I cannot imagine how difficult this project has been for all of the above noted, complex and fraught with difficulties - I appreciate their diligence and my questions are sincere and earnest.)

 

I don't believe for a second that 're-zoning' is new. I highly suspect that this is just a front for trying to amend the amenity package.



#4782 JohnN

JohnN
  • Member
  • 2,172 posts

Posted 15 December 2016 - 03:13 PM

Interesting slant on the sewage story as CFAX Ryan Price concludes that
"In 2014, Esquimalt council used such a rezoning process for the same McLoughlin Point site to sink the region's sewage treatment efforts.": http://www.iheartrad...again-1.2277469

:)

#4783 JohnN

JohnN
  • Member
  • 2,172 posts

Posted 15 December 2016 - 05:52 PM

CRD sewage committee webcast video record of Dec 14 now uploaded. Sewage Project Board chair Bird starts her reports at 27:40 minute mark and Screech question at 34:15 minute mark:

:)

#4784 JohnN

JohnN
  • Member
  • 2,172 posts

Posted 16 December 2016 - 06:32 AM

Excerpts:
Esquimalt Coun. Meagan Brame said Thursday the region should take a deep breath, noting the rezoning is part of a normal process. “We can’t ever look at a project and say this automatically is going to be done,” she said. “We always have to look at the details. Up to this point, we as a council haven’t been given the plan.”
...Esquimalt Coun. Tim Morrison said the McLoughlin rezoning is no different from any other, and that it is not one of his priorities. “I’m just quite disgusted with how the CRD steered this process away from the east-side, west-side public process that we had agreed to,” Morrison said. “Quite frankly, at this point it seems to me that nobody cares about public process anymore.”

Edited by JohnN, 16 December 2016 - 06:32 AM.

:)

#4785 JohnN

JohnN
  • Member
  • 2,172 posts

Posted 16 December 2016 - 06:56 AM

Excerpts:
Dave Clancy, former vice-president of Bird Construction, has taken the job as project director...
...Prior to working for Bird Construction, he was a senior vice-president with AECOM, where he held numerous positions.
...Elizabeth Scott has been appointed project deputy director at a salary of $178,000 with a 15 per cent retention bonus.

:)

#4786 JohnN

JohnN
  • Member
  • 2,172 posts

Posted 16 December 2016 - 07:00 AM

Excerpts:
This is not a case of Esquimalt being obstructive, it’s a matter of the sewage panel being thorough and getting things right. Not to do so would be irresponsible. But why, in a project that has been so thoroughly discussed and dissected, could this “misalignment” have been overlooked?
...There’s no reason to believe Esquimalt council will take this as an opportunity to block the sewage project. In fact, Bird is optimistic, praising Esquimalt staff and calling it “a positive sign” that Esquimalt council has approved working toward a timetable that includes holding a public hearing Feb. 20 and having the rezoning considered by council by Feb. 27.
...We hope this rezoning process is done by the book without being sidetracked by those who believe we don’t need to treat our sewage, or who believe the plant should be built somewhere else. Those issues have been settled.

:)

#4787 spanky123

spanky123
  • Member
  • 21,014 posts

Posted 16 December 2016 - 07:48 AM

So why are we hiring new executive staff before Esquimalt has agreed to rezone the property? If they refuse then won't we be back in exactly the same position as we were with Sweetnam?



#4788 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,558 posts

Posted 16 December 2016 - 08:49 AM

Councillor Morrison doesn't sound too thrilled about the whole thing. I think we've still got plenty of resentment in Esquimalt among folks who were promised an "out" but ended up carrying the entirety of the burden a few years later.
  • spanky123 likes this

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#4789 JohnN

JohnN
  • Member
  • 2,172 posts

Posted 16 December 2016 - 09:43 AM

More from CRD sewage committee Dec 14 meeting video recording: at 59:40 minute mark, Atwell asks how the budget for the treatment plant has gone from $179 million just two years ago to $384 million today - a $205 million jump. Mrs. Bird responds that it was probably a combination of inflation and addition of tertiary treatment.

Webcast video recording: http://crd.ca.granic...d=1&clip_id=851


:)

#4790 Sparky

Sparky

    GET OFF MY LAWN

  • Moderator
  • 13,148 posts

Posted 16 December 2016 - 10:41 AM

^ "probably" ?



#4791 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 16 December 2016 - 10:50 AM

More from CRD sewage committee Dec 14 meeting video recording: at 59:40 minute mark, Atwell asks how the budget for the treatment plant has gone from $179 million just two years ago to $384 million today - a $205 million jump. Mrs. Bird responds that it was probably a combination of inflation and addition of tertiary treatment.

Webcast video recording: http://crd.ca.granic...d=1&clip_id=851

 

I'm glad we have Atwell chipping away here with questions.


  • SusanJones likes this
<p><span style="font-size:12px;"><em><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">"I don’t need a middle person in my pizza slice transaction" <strong>- zoomer, April 17, 2018</strong></span></em></span>

#4792 Sparky

Sparky

    GET OFF MY LAWN

  • Moderator
  • 13,148 posts

Posted 16 December 2016 - 10:55 AM

^ Me too.

 

I am still wondering how the Hartland property all of a sudden was rezoned to process liquid waste.

 

Frank Leonard went on record by saying he would have to rent a BIG hall to hold the public hearing for the zoning change. Then all of a sudden the definition of "waste" changed in the zoning bylaw and POOF the need for public discussion vanished.

 

Back room crap.....so to speak.  



#4793 JohnN

JohnN
  • Member
  • 2,172 posts

Posted 16 December 2016 - 11:18 AM

^ "probably" ?

"Probably" was summary of what Bird appeared to be saying (starting about the 01:00:40 mark), where she said that a reconciliation of costs (old and new estimates of sewage plant) should be done, her following statement when she said "with certainty" about part of the costs, elements "come to mind right off the top" and then her following statement offering again to get a "high-level reconciliation to answer that question". http://crd.ca.granic...d=1&clip_id=851


:)

#4794 Bingo

Bingo
  • Member
  • 16,666 posts

Posted 16 December 2016 - 08:24 PM

How would the severance package be for the new folks?

 

An executive with 30 years experience in management, technical, legal and financial aspects of wastewater infrastructure has been appointed to head the Capital Regional District’s $765-million sewage-treatment project.

Clancy, who holds a certificate in civil engineering from Mohawk College of Applied Arts and Technology, will be paid $312,000 a year plus a 15 per cent retention bonus.

Elizabeth Scott has been appointed project deputy director at a salary of $178,000 with a 15 per cent retention bonus.

 

The last CRD sewage-treatment program, dubbed Seaterra, was headed by Albert Sweetnam. He was hired in 2013 on a contract paying $290,000 a year plus benefits.

Sweetnam was paid severance of $500,000 when he left in September 2015.

 

 

 



#4795 JohnN

JohnN
  • Member
  • 2,172 posts

Posted 17 December 2016 - 02:16 PM

Rezoning of McLoughlin Point causing uncertainty with sewage treatment plan

Pamela Roth
Victoria News
Dec 16, 2016 at 12:00 PM

 

Excerpts:

With a Sept. 30 deadline looming for the CRD to submit its plan for
wastewater treatment to the federal government or risk losing hundreds
of millions of dollars in funding, the board voted in mid-September to
build a wastewater treatment facility at McLoughlin Point, backing a
plan that calls for a single 108 megalitre/day plant for tertiary
treatment at an estimated cost of $765 million.

Bird noted the project has a much smaller footprint, larger setbacks
from the shoreline and would have solids transported by pipe to the
Hardland landfill in Saanich. Esquimalt would receive $20 million in
amenities, including an annual payment of $55,000.

On Wednesday, Bird said the project board thought the redesigned plant
aligned with the zoning bylaw, but the bylaw was quite specific in
terms of some of the requirements for the increased density needed to
accommodate the plant footprint, such as a ferry service to carry
supplies to McLoughlin Point and other “fairly quirky” components.

“It would be incorrect to say that there's no risk associated with
this (rezoning) process, but I am cautiously optimistic...We are doing
everything we can to mitigate that risk and come up with a package
that both council and members of the community and the broader DND
community think represents a reasonable design, and something that
adds value there.”


http://www.vicnews.c.../407119726.html


:)

#4796 Hotel Mike

Hotel Mike

    Hotel Mike

  • Member
  • 2,235 posts

Posted 17 December 2016 - 02:22 PM

Any feeling about how Esquimalt Council will vote this time? I think Tim Morrison is dead set against it. Barb has made compromise noises about it.


Don't be so sure.:cool:

#4797 spanky123

spanky123
  • Member
  • 21,014 posts

Posted 17 December 2016 - 02:33 PM

^ I think that it all depends on what the CRD project board is willing to pay. If I was on Esquimalt council why not ask for the $20M promised this time around plus the free plant (ie no fees for Esquimalt homeowners) that they originally negotiated.



#4798 RFS

RFS
  • Member
  • 5,444 posts

Posted 17 December 2016 - 03:16 PM

765 million dollars. that is obscene

#4799 johnk

johnk
  • Member
  • 1,608 posts

Posted 17 December 2016 - 03:59 PM

765 million dollars. that is obscene


It will be even obscener by the time the first turd circles the bowl.

#4800 North Shore

North Shore
  • Member
  • 2,169 posts

Posted 17 December 2016 - 04:14 PM

I can't see it being stopped this time; Esquimalt Council might say no, but I'm sure that the Province would step in at that point, and over-rule them..


Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?

You're not quite at the end of this discussion topic!

Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
 



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


    Bing (1)