[Downtown Victoria] Centro condos | 54.4m | 19- & 14-storeys | Canceled
Posted 23 November 2007 - 12:38 PM
Posted 23 November 2007 - 12:42 PM
Posted 23 November 2007 - 01:40 PM
Does Orchard House have any on top? Perhaps Camosack is different due to its unique location and also the fact that it is rental rather than strata title.
Posted 23 November 2007 - 01:46 PM
So do I – and I like the look of the aerials and the way they are installed - - and I love to see the Camosak off in the distance - - of course I know a lot of people don’t - - of course they don’t - - who wants to see a building blocking our view of the sky - - I think the most impressive building in the world is the Chicago Sears tower - - I can just imagine the people of Chicago when it was proposed - - it’s to tall – it’s to black – it’s not set back – there’s no mid block walk through – oh my god, there are two aerials on the roof – if I stand in front of it, I can’t see what’s on the other side – the building next door won’t like it – it’s going to cause a big black hole to appear in our city - - tourist won’t come any more because we put up a beautiful building - - send it back to the architects and shave it down to 12 floors - - lets study it for another few years!
Posted 23 November 2007 - 02:01 PM
Anyhow, why would a developer market a tower for antennas when another of his towers would stand five storeys taller and two blocks to the north? I think it's a safe bet Centro won't be eyed for any communications masts.
As for Camosack the reason it has antennas is because it's the most logical place for them within the core.
Posted 23 November 2007 - 02:12 PM
Posted 24 November 2007 - 01:09 AM
I think the most impressive building in the world is the Chicago Sears tower - - I can just imagine the people of Chicago when it was proposed - - it’s to tall – it’s to black – it’s not set back – there’s no mid block walk through – oh my god, there are two aerials on the roof – if I stand in front of it, I can’t see what’s on the other side – the building next door won’t like it – it’s going to cause a big black hole to appear in our city - - tourist won’t come any more because we put up a beautiful building - - send it back to the architects and shave it down to 12 floors - - lets study it for another few years!
Well put 2F2R, it is clear that cities where larege skyscrapers dominate the skyline completely lack vibrancy; their residents live in total gloom and despair that their views of the sky are vanquished and tourists avoid such places like the plague.
I wonder then why more tourists will visit New York City each year than will visit Victoria in a decade? Isn't our unique charme and olde worlde character sufficient to lure more people here than all the museums, galleries, theatres and restaurants in Manhattan? I am at a loss to explain this phenomenon when clearly they are doing everything wrong according to the Victorian Guide to Building a Better City (subtitle: When 14 Stories is Enuff). Please explain.
Posted 02 December 2007 - 01:58 PM
Posted 02 December 2007 - 02:42 PM
Posted 02 December 2007 - 02:42 PM
Posted 03 December 2007 - 11:13 AM
The many high-rises that have been built and are planned have already partially eliminated any interest that the city center has for me and I avoid it at all costs.
This has become something of a catchphrase among the downtown bashers; they don't seem to realize that it reveals their true colours. It is simply not plausible that a couple of new apartment buildings behind the Crystal Garden would discourage somebody from shopping on Government Street or Johnson Street, or in the Bay Centre or Chinatown, etc.
The writer would never admit it, but the whole reason downtown went into the toilet in the first place is because people like her/him decided to turn their backs on it. The downturn didn't happen a year ago; it began happening twenty years ago and more.
I'll make this point until I'm blue in the face: new residential development downtown signifies a sea change; we're finally leaving downtown's destiny in the hands of people who LIKE downtown, rather than in the hands of those who despise it.
Posted 03 December 2007 - 11:21 AM
Afaik nobody has ever proposed doing anything to change Old Town & Chinatown.
Check out the "long gone greats" thread to see the extent of the damage that was done between the 1940s-1970s.
For some reason those past atrocities get a pass in the popular memory. Probably because no highrises were involved.
Posted 03 December 2007 - 11:28 AM
Posted 03 December 2007 - 11:40 AM
Posted 03 December 2007 - 11:48 AM
Posted 04 December 2007 - 12:59 AM
"[Randall's] aesthetic poll was more accurate than his political acumen"
-Tom Hawthorne, Toronto Globe and Mail
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users