Mike Burgers with cheese are still exactly the same and that is a good thing
Food services comings and goings in Victoria
#3241
Posted 21 May 2017 - 11:10 PM
- VicHockeyFan, Rob Randall and LJ like this
#3242
Posted 23 May 2017 - 10:21 AM
No idea. The intel we have is reliable*, but non-specific**. We certainly have known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
* reliable in that we can use it for click-bait
** non-specific in that we can change our address and phone number if we get sued over the info
No, a proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven.
Edited by Jackerbie, 23 May 2017 - 10:22 AM.
#3243
Posted 23 May 2017 - 05:18 PM
What's the law regarding pricing at restaurants that differs from one medium to another? For example, say the menu outlines a happy hour special priced for X, but a large sign within the restaurant identifies the special priced for Y, which price is the price the consumer expected to pay, legally speaking?
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#3244
Posted 23 May 2017 - 05:27 PM
Kind of like Peaches at Thrifty's are advertised at .99 each. You get to the store and they have them at $1.19 each. You are going to pay the $1.19. Best practices would be give to you for the mistaken price (if you are the one to bring it to their attention). But that can only go so far. Sign on door saying mistake and then pay the actual sale price.
#3245
Posted 23 May 2017 - 05:35 PM
I was at a restaurant the other day and they had a deal listed inside the restaurant. But when I went to order it (without looking at the menu, just going by the signage) they said they wouldn't honour it because the deal had changed a week prior.
So in short a sign inside said one thing, the menu said another. I said that was a bit silly, and their retort was that they've been too busy to change the sign.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#3246
Posted 23 May 2017 - 05:43 PM
#3247
Posted 23 May 2017 - 05:46 PM
Hopefully the "law" says that you work it out, and if not, it goes to civil court between you and the shopkeeper. Seems silly to have laws or regulations over trivial stuff.
#3248
Posted 23 May 2017 - 07:11 PM
How to work it out is not what I'm asking.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#3250
Posted 23 May 2017 - 09:02 PM
#3251
Posted 23 May 2017 - 09:13 PM
I hope "La Tortilla" can spring for another coat of outrageously bright yellow paint and a new awning.
Does anyone really want to eat tulips?
#3252
Posted 23 May 2017 - 09:46 PM
I hope "La Tortilla" can spring for another coat of outrageously bright yellow paint and a new awning.
Does anyone really want to eat tulips?
It seems also with their first coat, they also did not go very high, like thay had no ladders. Lacks finish.
#3253
Posted 24 May 2017 - 08:44 AM
We went out for buck-a-shuck oysters at a tourist-district place and when the bill came it was buck-and-a-half shuck. Our server graciously explained "that's an old menu".I was at a restaurant the other day and they had a deal listed inside the restaurant. But when I went to order it (without looking at the menu, just going by the signage) they said they wouldn't honour it because the deal had changed a week prior.
So in short a sign inside said one thing, the menu said another. I said that was a bit silly, and their retort was that they've been too busy to change the sign.
Oohhh-kay. They won't see us again and probably not any of the two dozen friends we warned.
- Rob Randall likes this
#3254
Posted 24 May 2017 - 10:16 AM
It's a small thing but I wonder if it's legal to have a price on a menu but charge a different price .We went out for buck-a-shuck oysters at a tourist-district place and when the bill came it was buck-and-a-half shuck. Our server graciously explained "that's an old menu".
Oohhh-kay. They won't see us again and probably not any of the two dozen friends we warned.
What would happen if you refused to pay the inflated price .
Some how it doesn't seem legal to me .
I have seem on a menu something to the effect that prices may vary .
Just because you have that on there is it legal you can charge
what ever you want .
#3255
Posted 24 May 2017 - 10:24 AM
If you refused to pay the price, the police could be called and potentially you could be arrested for "food by fraud". That would be at the discretion of the officer, of course. You might be able to plead your case on the spot and receive a sympathetic ear.
The other thing you could do, is try to negotiate for the lower price with a reasonable manager. Might work.
Failing that you might pay the higher price, but then collect evidence and then file a claim in small claims against the place to get the extra money back.
Thankfully, it usually does not go this far.
There IS a bit of a difficulty with lots of external online sources that the restaurant has no control of, that might list old prices or specials. And the patron says "I saw it on the internet" but has not idea what site. That's not really the fault of the restaurant.
- HB likes this
#3256
Posted 24 May 2017 - 10:32 AM
Weird.
Matt.
#3257
Posted 24 May 2017 - 10:50 AM
Am I understanding you Matt ,that legally Johnk did not have to pay the extra for his oysters than the posted price on the menu .Every once in a while we get someone in who says they have a coupon from Yelp that entitles them to a free dessert. We don't honour it, and tell them to take it up with Yelp, whom we have zero relationship with. Otherwise, the lowest of the posted prices on premise is what you pay.
Weird.
Matt.
Menu said 1$ . That's it .
#3258
Posted 24 May 2017 - 10:58 AM
^ There is no written law that says that, but you can likely win your civil suit. I can have a dancing gypsy yelling out prices as my price list, but then when I ring you in, I'll expect you to pay the price I ask. You can always sue me.
- Matt R. and HB like this
#3260
Posted 24 May 2017 - 11:14 AM
The competitions bureau has jurisdiction here under its truth in advertising policy. I have used them before to deal with local businesses who use deceptive marketing tactics. It is very effective. Won't get you your $10 back but the organization will have to deal with the regulators.
- Nparker likes this
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users