[Downtown Victoria] The Hudson | Condos & Commercial | HBC block redevelopment; Phase 1 | 6-storeys | Built - completed in 2010
#21
Posted 05 October 2006 - 08:43 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#22
Posted 06 October 2006 - 09:49 AM
Carolyn Heiman, Times Colonist
Published: Friday, October 06, 2006
The owner of the former Bay site has been asked to provide Victoria council with a market feasibility study to justify why parts of his project need to be close to 60 per cent higher than allowed for the site.
It is the first time the city has asked a developer to financially rationalize a request for additional height and density.
[...]
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#23
Posted 07 October 2006 - 12:41 PM
I am glad that Randall pointed out that slim tall buildings are much much better than the stuff they approve now! The more I wander around Victoria, the uglier the place gets with all they low rises.
I don't know, but when I walk around I tend to look ahead of me, so whether a building is 4 stories high or 30 stories, it doesn't make a difference. Except that the high building will block much less sunlight on the street! Maybe these the counsel members should stop walking with their noses in the air!
#24
Posted 07 October 2006 - 06:39 PM
#25
Posted 09 October 2006 - 08:34 PM
All the luck to the developers keeping there money trying to building such a massive porject right in the downtown core!
#26
Posted 11 October 2006 - 11:22 AM
By Brennan Clarke
Victoria News
Oct 11 2006
Council asks Townline to justify height request
If developer Rick Illich wants extra height and density on the massive project he has planned for the former Bay building on Douglas Street, he'll have to show city council his books.
At Thursday's committee-of-the-whole meeting, council voted to send the project to public hearing once Illich, owner of Richmond-based Townline Group has met an exhaustive list of preliminary conditions.
That list includes a market feasibility study explaining why the extra height and density are needed to make the project profitable.
[...]
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#27
Posted 11 October 2006 - 11:40 AM
#28
Posted 11 October 2006 - 11:52 AM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#29
Posted 13 October 2006 - 08:57 AM
Folks, look what they're going to build on the Woodward's site in Vancouver.
Folks, the developer in Nanaimo claims he needs to go to almost 40-stories just to achieve viability! No massive department store to fix up there. No big old parkade to knock down.
#30
Posted 13 October 2006 - 10:53 AM
Council, as does the public realises that there too much to lose if this falls through.
Besides, Townline has does a great job so far educating the public that the proposed hieght is fiscally vital to this project's survival - to the old Bay building's new life.
I have no inside info to back this up - just a feeling.
#31
Posted 15 October 2006 - 02:07 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#32
Posted 16 October 2006 - 03:33 PM
#33
Posted 16 October 2006 - 04:37 PM
#34
Posted 16 October 2006 - 05:11 PM
#35
Posted 16 October 2006 - 07:14 PM
I saw the crane up just before six and it got dark outside!!!
#36
Posted 16 October 2006 - 07:16 PM
That sounds a bit superstitious to me. It was probably a coincidental solar eclipse.
#37
Posted 16 October 2006 - 07:46 PM
#38
Posted 18 October 2006 - 08:17 AM
#39
Posted 21 October 2006 - 12:48 PM
#40
Posted 21 October 2006 - 01:17 PM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users