Jump to content

      



























Photo

[James Bay] The Breakwater | Townhomes| Built - completed in February 2008


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

#41 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 40,750 posts

Posted 29 March 2007 - 05:30 PM

I have to admit this is a pretty classy, albeit overpriced, project. Perhaps not the best density for the site, but still a handsome addition to the neighbourhood.

#42 gumgum

gumgum
  • Member
  • 7,069 posts

Posted 14 July 2007 - 03:39 PM

Not very interesting. But it's almost done anyway:







A couple of units actually have people living in them now:




It seems they're using Black Guard Cats for construction sites in James Bay...
Here's the one that was tickling my leg with her tail as I was taking pics:


Here's another one Holden West captured at Vicino, back in May.


#43 Holden West

Holden West

    Va va voom!

  • Member
  • 9,058 posts

Posted 14 July 2007 - 03:47 PM

"Excessive Setback Cat" strikes again.

Are you sure those aren't display suites? How can they get an occupancy permit while construction is still going on? I noticed Shutters was like that too.
"Beaver, ahoy!""The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there."
-City of Victoria website, 2009

#44 gumgum

gumgum
  • Member
  • 7,069 posts

Posted 14 July 2007 - 03:55 PM

^You might be right.

#45 Ms. B. Havin

Ms. B. Havin
  • Member
  • 5,052 posts

Posted 14 July 2007 - 04:24 PM

I think those THs are totally depressing-looking. Cheap. Boring brick and teeny-tiny windows. As for the soffits, don't get me started.... Those are ugly -- they look like vinyl siding soffits.
When you buy a game, you buy the rules. Play happens in the space between the rules.

#46 Baro

Baro
  • Member
  • 4,317 posts

Posted 14 July 2007 - 05:53 PM

setbacks, low density, ugly cheap looking construction, unfriendly wall, unfriendly pricetags. Seems just what jamesbay wants.
"beats greezy have baked donut-dough"

#47 gumgum

gumgum
  • Member
  • 7,069 posts

Posted 23 February 2008 - 08:12 PM

You can stamp this one "Completed".
















#48 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,757 posts

Posted 23 February 2008 - 08:26 PM

If not for that view of the Reef, there'd be absolutely no reason for sitting out on those dreary back decks. There's so much cookie-cutter repetition and yet the building is only two stories tall!

So are we supposed to believe it's a good fit for James Bay? James Bay is all about architectural monotony? Or maybe James Bay is about expensive properties that don't look expensive?

They should have taken some design cues from Ansonia in the Arbutus neighbourhood of Vancouver:
http://www.emporis.c...l/im/?id=530554

#49 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,757 posts

Posted 23 February 2008 - 08:49 PM

Careful attention to lack of detail.

I've never seen a building work so hard to not distinguish itself.

#50 zoomer

zoomer
  • Member
  • 2,144 posts
  • LocationVictoria - Downtown

Posted 23 February 2008 - 10:31 PM

wow, that's bizarrely disgustingly bland, tacky and institutional all at the same time...

thanks for all the updates gumgum!!!!! :D

#51 Baro

Baro
  • Member
  • 4,317 posts

Posted 24 February 2008 - 10:20 AM

This is what james bay wants? This is what will save them from evil rental towers and solve the affordable housing problem? Good works james bay...

#52 Ms. B. Havin

Ms. B. Havin
  • Member
  • 5,052 posts

Posted 24 February 2008 - 03:03 PM

Look at this closely, and also consider the price tag on these units:



I would wonder whether that gap where the stone floor tile meets the building is indicative of the quality of the workmanship here?
When you buy a game, you buy the rules. Play happens in the space between the rules.

#53 Baro

Baro
  • Member
  • 4,317 posts

Posted 24 February 2008 - 06:16 PM

That entrance looks like crap. There's zero excuse for boring design and bad workmanship.

#54 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,757 posts

Posted 24 February 2008 - 06:44 PM

Even if the neighbourhood all but demanded it?

#55 gumgum

gumgum
  • Member
  • 7,069 posts

Posted 24 February 2008 - 07:19 PM

Here's some of the interior.

#56 Holden West

Holden West

    Va va voom!

  • Member
  • 9,058 posts

Posted 18 April 2008 - 10:01 AM

Victoria condos are getting the spotlight today in the Globe's Friday real-estate feature:

ON SITE: VICTORIA
Town homes draw cross-continent commuters

THOMASINA BARNES
April 18, 2008

THE BREAKWATER

DEVELOPER: Three Point Properties

"The idea behind the Breakwater was to create a responsible development that fit into the surrounding neighbourhood," Mr. Brown says.

"This development has a low impact on the community. The height and timeless look help it to blend into what is already a beautiful neighbourhood."


"Beaver, ahoy!""The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there."
-City of Victoria website, 2009

#57 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,757 posts

Posted 18 April 2008 - 10:20 AM

... timeless look...


(barf)

#58 G-Man

G-Man

    Senior Case Officer

  • Moderator
  • 13,805 posts

Posted 18 April 2008 - 10:34 AM

invisibility is always timeless.

#59 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,552 posts

Posted 18 April 2008 - 10:39 AM

In terms of things that need fixing, the development really is "timeless." That is because it literally took no time for the project to look weathered (note the details in the picture above).

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


 



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users