
Endangered buildings list
#1
Posted 08 July 2013 - 06:09 PM
http://www.heritagec...-ten-endangered
#2
Posted 08 July 2013 - 09:42 PM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#3
Posted 08 July 2013 - 10:13 PM
#4
Posted 09 July 2013 - 06:42 AM
#5
Posted 09 July 2013 - 06:52 AM
#6
Posted 09 July 2013 - 05:09 PM
cook
yates
I wonder what they're like inside, whether they're sort of ok like the janion or if they're about to burn down, fall apart, etc.
http://www.vicnews.c.../213233501.htmlSIMON NATRASS: Derelict buildings a sad sign
By Simon Natrass - Victoria News
Published: June 27, 2013 12:00 PM
A decade ago, I stood on the curb outside 2321 Cook St. and dreamt about some of the things a creative owner could do with the abandoned two-storey apartment block.
Standing in that spot 10 years later with Russ Godfrey of the Tenant Resource Advisory Centre (TRAC), we revived those same fantasies about affordable housing units for artists, young workers, students and seniors.
Today, a heron nests in the building’s inaccessible second floor, at least one resident of a dozen or so units which sit waiting to be torn down.
We continued on to another derelict property – 1176 Yates St. – owned by the same landlord.
According to Godfrey, the demolition-by-neglect of buildings like those on Cook and Yates is, in part, responsible for the scarcity and rising cost of rental units.
“At a time when we need affordable housing,” he asks, “why are these buildings being allowed to rot and why do officials seem so reluctant to even talk about it?”
Several municipalities in the Capital Region have created bylaws to address the problem of derelict buildings, but experience has shown these to be largely unenforceable.
di castri house that needs a ton of work
royal oak ave
#7
Posted 09 July 2013 - 05:27 PM
#8
Posted 09 July 2013 - 07:35 PM
That can be expensive. In some cases, the cost of renovations would be more than what you could get back after putting it on the market.Fix them up
That's also very expensive, thanks to the capital gains tax.or sell them to someone who will,
Sometimes, but rarely. Even if you're lucky to get the heritage renovation grant, it only covers a tiny part of your expenses.either way there's huge financial incentives
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#9
Posted 10 July 2013 - 07:05 AM
#10
Posted 10 July 2013 - 07:19 AM
#11
Posted 10 July 2013 - 07:30 AM
I can only imagine the difficulty and the costs of a full-out commercial heritage renovation project that LeFevre is known for. Of course I'm sure it helped to get an insurance kickback after a couple of those projects went up in flames, but still, to make something work on that scale takes tremendous skill, serious elbow grease and a lot of luck.
As for officialdom, what can they really do? There are plenty of buildings that require renovations like our Johnson Street Bridge, the #1 fire hall and Crystal Pool! Luckily for a municipality money is no obstacle.
I would contest such a fine on the grounds that the City of Victoria had no problem deciding to raze a heritage bridge.What kind of fine are we looking at if someone razes a heritage building?
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#12
Posted 10 July 2013 - 08:34 AM
Here is an example of a building that should not be desiganted a heritage building because it is not.
This building was razed and all of the bricks and facia saved then stuck to the the mall when it was built.
This is not a building at all and it is definitely a heritagfe structure.
In my opinion they should never have been allowed to demolish the Driard Hotel and many of the other buidlings in this block.


This is what the Building looked like in about 1988 Oh hold on its not there it was demolished.

#13
Posted 10 July 2013 - 08:56 AM
Was it already abandoned a decade ago? I don't think so. Also, isn't that building 4 stories?A decade ago, I stood on the curb outside 2321 Cook St. and dreamt about some of the things a creative owner could do with the abandoned two-storey apartment block.
Jason Youmans says 2006:
From http://homelessnation.org/node/14809The plywood-covered windows of the once-stately Caldwell Apartments at 2321 Cook Street are a graffiti magnet. They’ve been that way since City of Victoria bylaw enforcers ordered the eviction of residents... in 2006, citing owner Robin Kimpton’s failure to comply with city ordinances...
We've talked about this one before. How many examples are there really of rental buildings being replaced by condominiums? Or subdivisions?As the older buildings that form the bulk of the region’s rental stock slowly fall into disrepair or are replaced by glittering condos and sprawling subdivisions...
#14
Posted 10 July 2013 - 09:49 AM
Currently 200 Douglas and 1969 Oak Bay are replacing rental stock with condos.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#15
Posted 10 July 2013 - 12:53 PM
Also, isn't that building 4 stories?
We've talked about this one before. How many examples are there really of rental buildings being replaced by condominiums? Or subdivisions?
Two main storeys plus and inhabitable basement and attic. Not positive if the basement is all suites or just storage.
I can only think of one recent apartment torn down, the one on lower Douglas by the park. Oh, and that apartment building and the old music conservatory torn down for the expansion of the park behind St. Ann's.
#16
Posted 10 July 2013 - 01:19 PM
But unlike decades back we're actually building new rental housing now including heritage renovations-turned-rentals.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#18
Posted 15 July 2013 - 10:05 AM
Lake Side Buoy - LEGO Nut - History Nerd - James Bay resident
#19
Posted 15 July 2013 - 01:50 PM
#20
Posted 15 July 2013 - 02:36 PM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users