Jump to content

      














Photo

Building tall in Victoria


  • Please log in to reply
213 replies to this topic

#201 Torrontes

Torrontes
  • Member
  • 285 posts

Posted 18 April 2020 - 11:04 AM

That's what I was wondering. If you look at the old ads for the "high end" apartments and condos they always list a variety of wild amenities, most of which disappeared over the years. 

 

Like bike workshops and gas firepits?   :whyme:



#202 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 26,302 posts

Posted 18 April 2020 - 11:24 AM

Like bike workshops and gas firepits?   

I think these have recently been installed along side the new housing in the 900 block of Pandora.



#203 mbjj

mbjj
  • Member
  • 1,620 posts

Posted 18 April 2020 - 01:42 PM

I lived in Orchard House in the late 1970s, then my mum lived in the suite until she went into a nursing home around 2000. The pool was great, I used to take my daughter over for a swim when she was little. The water was quite warm. There was an interior whirlpool as well. The grass always took a beating in the summer as I don't think they watered it. Last year my daughter and I went to look at a suite there. It had been very nicely renovated and was on the pool side. Don't recall the price.


  • Victoria Watcher likes this

#204 Jackerbie

Jackerbie
  • Member
  • 3,208 posts
  • LocationRichmond, BC

Posted 20 April 2020 - 07:27 AM

That's what I was wondering. If you look at the old ads for the "high end" apartments and condos they always list a variety of wild amenities, most of which disappeared over the years. 

 

I know someone who lives in an older apartment across from Beacon Hill Park, and one of the amenities is a tiki bar. You have to be your own bartender, sure, but all the decor is there right down to a palm frond awning over the bar counter.


  • Mike K., Nparker and Victoria Watcher like this

#205 Victoria Watcher

Victoria Watcher
  • Member
  • 14,295 posts

Posted 20 April 2020 - 07:36 AM

I know someone who lives in an older apartment across from Beacon Hill Park, and one of the amenities is a tiki bar. You have to be your own bartender, sure, but all the decor is there right down to a palm frond awning over the bar counter.

 

Enjoy the vast list of amenities available here including a pool, lounge/party room, view room on the roof, tiki-bar room, and a guest suite! 

 

http://www.vicreales...ria-bc-v8v-2p4/



#206 Jackerbie

Jackerbie
  • Member
  • 3,208 posts
  • LocationRichmond, BC

Posted 20 April 2020 - 07:43 AM

^ OK but no picture of the tiki bar in the listing? Guess they're saving it for the showing to get that WOW! moment and close the sale.


  • Victoria Watcher likes this

#207 Victoria Watcher

Victoria Watcher
  • Member
  • 14,295 posts

Posted 20 April 2020 - 07:47 AM

^ OK but no picture of the tiki bar in the listing? Guess they're saving it for the showing to get that WOW! moment and close the sale.

 

https://southislandc...et-victoria-bc/

 

screenshot-southislandcondos.com-2020.04.20-11_46_34.png

 

screenshot-southislandcondos.com-2020.04.20-11_46_24.png

 

screenshot-southislandcondos.com-2020.04.20-11_45_54.png


  • Rob Randall, Nparker and Jackerbie like this

#208 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 16,057 posts

Posted 18 July 2020 - 04:33 PM

How many times have we seen this? When somebody attempts to define "human scale", they inevitably imply that the entirety of old Victoria is not and never was "human scale." If we like Victoria for what it is and was then why would we advocate for the inversion of everything that it is and was?

 

Anyway, I'm still hopeful they'll figure out a way to address that housing shortage and those rising taxes (while also impeding the creation of new homes for new taxpayers):

 

 

Daily Colonist
November 8, 1975

Mayoralty forum: Rising taxes, housing lack among problems facing Pollen's successor

(candidate) McElroy expressed basic support for city council's zoning policies, but said he would go one step further.

The existing 14-story or 140-foot height limit, he said, was still too overwhelming for certain parts of the city.

"The height of a building shouldn't exceed the distance it is located from the street. This will automatically cause a human scale of all buildings that are going up," he said.


Edited by aastra, 18 July 2020 - 04:34 PM.


#209 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 16,057 posts

Posted 18 July 2020 - 05:26 PM

This was specifically relating to the Reid plan, which certainly would have been flirting with disaster in many aspects. It was an extremely tall project, an extremely large project, an extreme design, and an extreme treatment for the waterfront site. Plenty of potential for regrettable results.

 

But if we play ball with Clack's premise, what happens when we try to apply it to a recent development like the Sovereign on Broughton?

 

Did the Sovereign ruin the entire area within a few years? No, obviously it did not.

 

So then does that mean the Sovereign isn't a highrise? Fair enough, it's only 11 stories, right? So let's say the Sovereign didn't ruin the entire area within a few years because it was never a highrise to begin with.

 

But then... why were some people so worried about the impact of the Sovereign? And why are some people worried about considerably shorter lowrise proposals in the old town area, such as at Northern Junk?

 

It's as if we've taken legitimate concerns related to potentially overwhelming projects in the past and misapplied those same concerns to ever smaller modern projects.

 

 

Daily Colonist
October 2, 1971

Clack Backs Old Town Concept for Victoria

"To put highrise apartments into the Old Town, near or at the Inner Harbour waterfront, is completely unnecessary," he said.

Permission for one highrise development, Clack said, would "ruin the entire area within a few years."


Edited by aastra, 18 July 2020 - 05:27 PM.


#210 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 26,302 posts

Posted 18 July 2020 - 05:45 PM

 

This was specifically relating to the Reid plan, which certainly would have been flirting with disaster in many aspects...Plenty of potential for regrettable results...

Or maybe it would have encouraged other, better redevelopment of the waterfront. Instead we have had an additional 50 years of acres of asphalt as the first impression for many visitors to the city.



#211 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 26,302 posts

Posted 18 July 2020 - 05:49 PM

 

The height of a building shouldn't exceed the distance it is located from the street

Does this mean that if a building is set 8 meters back from the street it can only be 8 meters tall? That's absurd. In which downtown cores has this architectural principle been consistently and effectively applied?



#212 sebberry

sebberry

    Resident Housekeeper

  • Moderator
  • 18,815 posts
  • LocationVictoria

Posted 18 July 2020 - 05:54 PM

How many times have we seen this? When somebody attempts to define "human scale", they inevitably imply that the entirety of old Victoria is not and never was "human scale." If we like Victoria for what it is and was then why would we advocate for the inversion of everything that it is and was?
 
Anyway, I'm still hopeful they'll figure out a way to address that housing shortage and those rising taxes (while also impeding the creation of new homes for new taxpayers):
 

Daily Colonist
November 8, 1975

Mayoralty forum: Rising taxes, housing lack among problems facing Pollen's successor

(candidate) McElroy expressed basic support for city council's zoning policies, but said he would go one step further.

The existing 14-story or 140-foot height limit, he said, was still too overwhelming for certain parts of the city.

"The height of a building shouldn't exceed the distance it is located from the street. This will automatically cause a human scale of all buildings that are going up," he said.



Sorry.. that last line. If a building is a sidewalk width from the street, how does that permit anything bigger than a dog house to be built?
  • Nparker likes this

Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network

Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams

 


#213 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 16,057 posts

Posted 18 July 2020 - 06:02 PM

This is what I'm saying. He was calling for absurdly short buildings that would have been shorter than an average person in some situations. And why was he calling for such? To keep things "human scale". But if that's what "human scale" really is, then that means literally every building in Victoria's old town (the thing we're supposedly trying to preserve and protect) is many magnitudes beyond "human scale". (As we would logically expect... we're talking about buildings after all)

 

Can you really preserve a forest by prohibiting the planting of new trees and prohibiting anything taller than a shrub?


  • Nparker likes this

#214 Victoria Watcher

Victoria Watcher
  • Member
  • 14,295 posts

Posted 29 July 2020 - 04:25 AM

i see no good reason not to have this area all be tall.

 

and yes i have no great interest in seeing the industrial land/zoning preserved here.

 

 screenshot-www.google.com-2020.07.29-08_23_09.png

 

the views up and down the gorge would be very nice.


Edited by Victoria Watcher, 29 July 2020 - 04:25 AM.


 



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users