STAY CONNECTED TO VIBRANTVICTORIA
WHAT'S HAPPENING ON CITIFIED VICTORIA
This topic is lockedNo it's not. Everyone rides bikes.
I think they are removing parking to put in bike lanes.
Live discussion | City Of Victoria Council Meeting | 212-220 Cook Public Hearing
Started by
sebberry
, Dec 08 2016 06:32 PM
181 replies to this topic
#82
nerka
-
- Member
- 1,236 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:23 PM
Reading through the many correspondence attachments. Lots of letters opposed but quite a few in support as well. Some very well written letters of support.
Like others here I puzzle over when power poles became the benchmark height for developments
- Nparker likes this
#84
Nparker
-
- Member
- 40,750 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:25 PM
Can't have a developer turn a profit.
- sebberry likes this
#85
Nparker
-
- Member
- 40,750 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:25 PM
The DINK makes sense!
- nerka likes this
.
#87
Nparker
-
- Member
- 40,750 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:27 PM
She's praising bike lanes. The mayor needs to hear no more.
#88
On the Level
-
- Member
- 2,891 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:31 PM
Oh......I heard a young woman state Bike Bike Walk Bike Bike...young couple.
Now an elderly woman in support.......
Is this true!
#89
Nparker
-
- Member
- 40,750 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:33 PM
Andrew Reeve is making a good argument in support of this project.
- AndrewReeve likes this
#90
nerka
-
- Member
- 1,236 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:33 PM
My gosh, three sane speakers in a row
- AndrewReeve likes this
#91
VicHockeyFan
-
- Suspended User
- 52,121 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:36 PM
Can't have a developer turn a profit.
Yes, that guy had lots of sneering. Wonder if he'll turn a profit when he sell his Fairfield home.
- Bingo likes this
<p><span style="font-size:12px;"><em><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">"I don’t need a middle person in my pizza slice transaction" <strong>- zoomer, April 17, 2018</strong></span></em></span>
#92
Bingo
-
- Member
- 16,666 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:36 PM
Andre wants the bike lanes to be on Vancouver Street, so he makes sense.
- AndrewReeve and On the Level like this
#94
Nparker
-
- Member
- 40,750 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:38 PM
Seems to be a real demographic shift with this proposal; I've never seen so many "younger" people in support of a project.
- sebberry likes this
#95
Bingo
-
- Member
- 16,666 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:39 PM
He likes Pic a Flick and likes more trees and likes the project.
- Nparker likes this
#96
Nparker
-
- Member
- 40,750 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:43 PM
No to density = yes to urban sprawl. I couldn't have said it better myself.
- On the Level likes this
#97
Bingo
-
- Member
- 16,666 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:44 PM
Good! They're going to take a 5 minute break, and I'm done.
#99
nerka
-
- Member
- 1,236 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:46 PM
Quite the young-old split in support/opposition for the project. I pray I don't turn into a reflexive NIMBY over the next 20 years.
- Mike K. likes this
#100
Nparker
-
- Member
- 40,750 posts
Posted 08 December 2016 - 09:48 PM
Lots of people see this project as the future. I think that's what also scares a lot of the opponents - they fear change and they fear the future.
- Mike K. likes this
You're not quite at the end of this discussion topic!
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
