[Downtown Victoria] The Union | Condos | 5- and 5-storeys | Built - Completed in 2014
#101
Posted 11 March 2011 - 03:00 PM
The DP report is located here:
http://victoria.civi...517 Fisgard.pdf
#102
Posted 18 March 2011 - 09:35 AM
By Robert Randall • Published on Friday, March 18, 2011
At a Thursday meeting of the Planning and Land Use Standing Committee, councillors agreed with a staff recommendation to send the Union condo project to a future public hearing.
The five-storey mixed-use proposal in the heart of Chinatown would feature two buildings separated by a courtyard, with a walkway linking Pandora to Fisgard.
More...
#103
Posted 18 March 2011 - 10:05 AM
#104
Posted 18 March 2011 - 11:06 AM
Why do they need a walkway from Pandora to Fisgard? Isn't that what Fan Tan's for?
'Cuz we need "Fan Tan 2: The Less Interesting Sequel"
#105
Posted 18 March 2011 - 12:53 PM
That said, this isn't a horrible place for a mid-block, it would link up with the cool little walkways around those live/work townhouses no?
#106
Posted 18 March 2011 - 05:56 PM
Madoff noted the ordinariness of the balconies and recommended they be made to look like they were affixed to the building instead of being integrated into the facade. This, she said, would be in keeping with the distinctive look of Chinatown’s architecture which often features details like wrought iron balconies and fire escapes.
Inset Balcony One
Inset Balcony Two
Inset Balcony Three
Inset Balcony Four
Inset Balcony Five
Inset Balcony Six
Inset Balcony Seven
Inset Balcony Eight
So maybe the architect was actually trying to do something that is seen around Chinatown!
#107
Posted 18 March 2011 - 06:03 PM
Does the planning and land use committee really have any business making comments like this? I would have thought their purview was usage and density, not design details, which I'd leave to the pros on the Design Panel.
Anyhow, I agree that this building looks great, and I hope it moves forward smoothly.
#108
Posted 18 March 2011 - 09:52 PM
Why do they need a walkway from Pandora to Fisgard? Isn't that what Fan Tan's for?
The site contains what was once Theatre Alley. Most of it has been lost but a lot of people including the DRA would like to see it restored. It would not be like Fan Tan Alley, but more like Dragon Alley.
#109
Posted 18 March 2011 - 10:01 PM
Agh this building looks great. Does Coun. Madoff even walk around Chinatown?
Inset Balcony One
Inset Balcony Two
Inset Balcony Three
Inset Balcony Four
Inset Balcony Five
Inset Balcony Six
Inset Balcony Seven
Inset Balcony Eight
So maybe the architect was actually trying to do something that is seen around Chinatown!
I'm sorry, I should have clarified; Madoff's comments referred to the upper two storeys of balconies, not the lower ones that resemble the inset balconies seen in G-man's links. I have modified the sentence to make that distinction.
I agree with this suggestion to make them appear more 'attached' rather than your standard condo balcony. Sorry if my wording made it unclear.
As for why design details are being discussed at a Planning and Land Use committee, well, all I can say is that Councillors serve on many different committees and it can be difficult to remember which hat you're wearing. Kind of like when we talk about bridge design or traffic in the Johnson St. Bridge funding thread. You know you really shouldn't but you can't help sneaking in that comment.
#110
Posted 04 April 2011 - 12:36 AM
As for the building, I find it "appropriately boring" which means it will probably come to fruition.
#111
Posted 04 April 2011 - 06:39 AM
#112
Posted 04 April 2011 - 06:46 AM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#113
Posted 04 April 2011 - 07:06 AM
#114
Posted 04 April 2011 - 07:14 AM
http://maps.google.c...7,0.007328&z=18
#115
Posted 21 April 2011 - 10:38 AM
#116
Posted 29 April 2011 - 01:09 PM
#117
Posted 29 April 2011 - 11:06 PM
Condo, retail complex OK'd for weed-choked lot
By BILL CLEVERLEY, Timescolonist.com
April 29, 2011
http://www.timescolo...1407/story.html
A long-neglected and weed covered lot linking Chinatown to Old Town is to be transformed by Vancouver-based Anthem Properties into a five-storey condominium and retail complex. [...]
#118
Posted 29 April 2011 - 11:25 PM
Pam Madoff is the greatest blight on the Victoria landscape.
#119
Posted 30 April 2011 - 11:29 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#120
Posted 30 April 2011 - 12:45 PM
I don't see an empty lot as a blight on the landscape....
Pretty good summary of the prevailing attitude in Victoria over the past 60 years or so.
Parking lots, empty lots, abandoned buildings... there's tremendous opportunity just about everywhere you look.
The real blight happens when you actually build something on those empty lots. Just look at south downtown. All of that opportunity, now ruined.
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users