Apologies if i'm misunderstanding you, but are you really insinuating that there is deliberate deception occurring here? One of the reasons the schools got away with what they did for so long is because the people wouldn't believe the First Nations claims.
The facts of the story are not in dispute; they don't need to disturb 215 children's graves to know for certain. It is known that residential schools often have unmarked graveyards. It was known that many children, some as young as 3, died at the Kamloops school, or went 'missing' and never seen again. They have ground penetrating radar that shows 215 radar signatures that the right size / shape / depth for child graves.
There's a preponderance of evidence that proves the claim. It may end up being 210 or 220 children, and maybe the youngest was 4, not 3. But at this point, if you're nit-picking these details in an attempt to discredit the entire story, that's a pretty bad look IMO.
I'm saying that there's a wide gulf between Indigenous Ways of Knowing and Western ways of knowing. I don't doubt there are hundreds of bodies buried there. But if the claim is never allowed to be confirmed by a Western expert, then we won't really ever know for sure because Indigenous Ways of Knowing are so vastly different from Western ones, and we should verify claims by Western standards because objective truth matters.
Check out this online course content from U of T re: Indigenous ways of knowing. Right up there beside empirical knowledge is Revealed Knowledge. Their press release even states they confirmed the findings with the help of their Knowledge Keepers. That makes me suspicious.
https://www.oise.uto...ys-of-knowing/
Sources of Indigenous Knowledge: #3 Revealed Knowledge. Indigenous knowledge is sometimes revealed through dreams, visions and intuitions.
More Western/conservative organizations probably wouldn't use the word "confirmed" in their press release when the findings were preliminary (ie, nothing's been dug up, nobody's seen a child's remains in any other form than a radar blip.
More appropriate wording might've been "Using GPR we've found what appears to be an unmarked cemetery containing potentially hundreds of bodies, and based on oral histories it's likely these are undocumented victims of the residential school."
But they said "This past weekend, with the help of a ground penetrating radar specialist, the stark truth of the preliminary findings came to light – the confirmation of the remains of 215 children who were students of the Kamloops Indian Residential School."
It's a subtle difference, but if Western ways of knowing are held back from the investigation entirely, then we'll have to take their word for whatever other information comes to light. And I'm not prepared to take at face value the information given to me by someone who thinks visions and intuitions are as valid as radiocarbon dating and forensic science.
I know it's a bad look, but I stand by it. (I also have the porch light on and a teddy bear outside, for the record).