it sounds counter-intuitive but it might actually reduce coal use.
here's the process:
Making cement is an energy-intensive process. To make a tonne of cement, B.C. plants shovel about a tonne-and-a-half of Texada Island limestone and other ingredients into a long kiln, fired by about 140 kilograms of coal per tonne, until it is a semi-molten lava of 1,450 C.
That heat, McSweeney said, sets off the chemical reaction in which carbon is stripped out of the limestone to be emitted as carbon dioxide, and creates about 60 per cent of cement-making’s greenhouse-gas emissions.
“(Those) are process emissions,” McSweeney said. “It doesn’t matter how you process — that 60 per cent emissions will always be there.”
The lava cool quickly into a hardened, almost metallic material called clinker, which is ground and blended with other elements to become cement, “the glue” that (at 7-to-10 per cent of the mix) binds sand, gravel and water into the essential construction material concrete.
It is the 40 per cent of carbon emissions related to firing the kilns that B.C.’s cement makers want to attack with the transition program.
http://www.vancouver...1358/story.html
this is interesting too:
The tax, at $30 per tonne of carbon dioxide emissions, pushed up the cost of coal — the industry’s primary fuel for its energy-intensive process — to between $53 and $62 per tonne at B.C. cement plants after it was applied in 2008, said Michael McSweeney, president of the Canadian Cement Association.
Then they watched as cheaper imports from Asia and the U.S. cut into their market share, from six per cent of the market before the tax to 40 per cent now, McSweeney said.
Edited by Victoria Watcher, 03 January 2020 - 08:36 AM.