Feel free to drop by http://www.punkhistorycanada.ca Visionary, I'd be pleased to help you enjoy a more gloves off approach to forums there.
:twisted:
hehe.
Posted 17 April 2007 - 09:28 AM
Feel free to drop by http://www.punkhistorycanada.ca Visionary, I'd be pleased to help you enjoy a more gloves off approach to forums there.
:twisted:
Posted 17 April 2007 - 03:53 PM
(...)
Businesses are not "abusing the poor." And we appreciate the argument of individual people having rights. However, when is it OK for the rights of an individual to infringe upon the rights of others?
It is not OK to occupy the doorway of a private property and to defecate, urinate and leave drug paraphernalia and garbage in your wake. It is not OK to put at risk the health and safety of other members of society because you feel you have a "right" to do all of the above. And it is not OK to jeopardize the ability of business owners and their employees to make a living by threatening the return of their customers.
This is not an issue of "abusing the poor." Our community, unfortunately, has many poor people who are not involved in any of these circumstances. This issue is about a core group of problematic and often substance-dependent individuals who don't care about anyone's rights but their own.
(...)
Posted 18 April 2007 - 09:29 PM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Feel free to drop by http://www.punkhistorycanada.ca Visionary, I'd be pleased to help you enjoy a more gloves off approach to forums there.
:twisted:
Posted 18 April 2007 - 10:01 PM
Posted 19 April 2007 - 05:21 AM
Posted 19 April 2007 - 08:27 AM
Posted 19 April 2007 - 11:16 AM
NEAL PEIRCE Recent columns
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 'Humane Metropolis'
-- Are We Ready?
April 1, 2007
WASHINGTON -- Cities were once celebrated as ports of trade, railway hubs, seats of smoke-belching industries. Then they became known as office and banking centers. In the late 20th century, each big town had to have its own aquarium and stadiums. Recently there's been a new mantra -- cities as magnets for ``young creatives'' in arts and entrepreneurship.
Now, another idea has surfaced. It's called ``The Humane Metropolis.'' A book with that title, edited by Rutherford Platt, was recently published by the University of Massachusetts Press and the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. A conference on the topic was held a week ago in Pittsburgh.
So what is a ``humane metropolis''?
The key words seem to be green, healthy, sociable, civic, and inclusive.
A metropolis (i.e., metro region or citistate) is considered green if it fosters humans' connections to the natural world -- an idea Anne Whiston Spirn promoted in her seminal 1984 book ``The Granite Garden.'' Spirn rejected the idea -- easily absorbed if one watches too many ``concrete jungle'' films, or even televised nature documentaries -- that the natural world begins beyond the urban fringe. ``Nature in the city,'' she wrote, ``must be cultivated, like a garden, rather than ignored or subdued.''
That means renewed attention to welcoming urban parks, from entire ``green necklace'' systems within metro areas to the emerald-green sanctuary of small vest-pocket parks. Community gardens, green roofs, street trees and planted medians all count -- and today more than ever as antidotes to the ``urban heat island'' phenomenon and the spread of global warming-inducing greenhouse gases.
Recovery of barren industrial ``brownfields'' is one companion strategy; another is creating ecological habitats on such bleak sites as sanitary landfills. There's even an experiment now to nurture biodiversity atop a literal landscape of death -- the Fresh Kills landfill on New York’s Staten Island, where the World Trade Center debris was deposited.
Closely allied are ``green blue'' strategies -- handling urban water in more sensitive, planet-protecting ways, by ``daylighting'' streams once enclosed in concrete pipes and by filtering stormwater more slowly through swales and other forms of landscaping that avoid big engineering solutions in favor of nature's more modest but ecologically sound ways.
Peoples' health is the next key to a humane metropolis: to reduce asthma-inducing auto, truck and industrial pollution, and now to attack the obesity epidemic impacting American society. Public health researcher Anne Lusk calls for linear urban parks to encourage not just walking and biking but such energetic activities as running, skating and rock climbing. She also suggests ``health enterprise zones'' to encourage gyms, stores offering fresh produce and other health-oriented businesses in rundown areas.
The humane metropolis advocates would have modern cities rethought -- from street plans to entire neighborhood layouts -- to be more sociable, civic and inclusive.
Gated communities, writes Edward Blakely (now development director in New Orleans), are a prime enemy of social and shared urban experience. These areas have expanded rapidly in recent decades. Asks Blakely: ``If there is little contact, then where is the social contract? If there is no social contract, then who will support the 'public' needs of society, affordable housing, parks, health care and education?''
Sheer urban sprawl, with the long and often grueling commutes it requires, creates some of the same separation and potential polarization -- racial, economic and social -- across America's fast-growing metro regions. And as Deborah and Frank Popper write, the result of the regionwide population explosion of the last half century has been to make more and more of America's gathering places privately owned, from regional shopping malls to conference hotels to industrial parks, ``each designed to be reliably predictable and controllable.''
The ``humane metropolis'' advocates, bent on shared streets and spaces, have no single solution. Their idea is simply to protect and create all possible natural areas -- parks, greenways, forest tracts -- fostering a shared sense of ``ecological stewardship.'' They're strongly for promotion of urban gardening and farm markets. They support efforts toward environmental justice, so that low-income areas are not burdened with undue, damaging pollution.
And, of course, they aim to create welcoming, green places in cities -- nature within urban places that will draw people together to rub shoulders, recreate, have fun and, with luck, even get to know each other. Adding, they hope, social justice: as Ford Foundation official Carl Anthony writes, ``issues of race and poverty, social environmental justice, must be central to the way we envision a truly humane metropolis, bringing together people and nature in the 21st century.”
Platt sums it up: ``In the decades ahead, the emphasis must shift from limiting 'urban sprawl' to making the resulting metropolitan fabric as green, habitable, and humane as possible.''
Neal Peirce's e-mail address is mailto:nrp@citistates.com.
Posted 21 April 2007 - 11:04 AM
Posted 22 April 2007 - 05:36 PM
Posted 22 April 2007 - 06:19 PM
Posted 22 April 2007 - 08:40 PM
How many homeless were there in 1992?
Posted 23 April 2007 - 04:01 AM
There are still significant problems, including the shortage of affordable and supported housing.
But addressing that shortage is well within our fiscal capacity. All that's needed is the will and a decision that, as a community, we don't think it's acceptable for people to be unnecessarily forced into homelessness.
That's the missing element. Governments talk about task forces and meetings and studies and spending increases.
But other communities, like [url=http://content.calgary.ca/CCA/City+Hall/Business+Units/Community+and+Neighbourhood+Services/Social+Research+Policy+and+Resources/Affordable+Housing+and+Homelessness/Homelessness+From+Prevention+to+Cure+.htm:44cc2]Calgary[/url:44cc2], have taken action, using approaches proven in other centres. We have not.
And as a result people are suffering and we face far higher long-term costs because of our failure.
Posted 23 April 2007 - 04:26 AM
Posted 23 April 2007 - 06:31 AM
How many homeless were there in 1992?
Re: your signature...
So who's the unreasonable man in this story?
Posted 23 April 2007 - 07:37 AM
Posted 23 April 2007 - 08:43 AM
Posted 23 April 2007 - 08:58 AM
Victoria's woes are tame stuff by the standards of most major cities though the individual stories are no less wrenching. There are perhaps 350 to 500 homeless in Victoria.
Posted 23 April 2007 - 09:00 AM
I've called the non-emergency number and have had cars come in five minutes.
Posted 23 April 2007 - 10:51 AM
Other Views
North Shore News
Monday, April 23, 2007
The resignation of the clinical head of Lions Gate Hospital's psychiatric department over chronic underfunding should serve as a warning for the provincial government. Our leaders cannot go on ignoring the problems created by lack of mental health funding.
The Lions Gate program is not facing its challenges alone. The problems are system-wide. Cutbacks to Riverview Hospital have left other facilities to pick up the slack. But without additional resources, it is only a matter of time before those facilities begin to buckle. Without dedicated programs, those who struggle with mental illness will be forced to turn elsewhere for help. Inevitably our hospitals and other facilities, not equipped to provide proper treatment, will be forced to step in.
Not only will the patients themselves suffer, but the system as a whole will begin to fail.
When our medical facilities can take no more, many of the most vulnerable individuals will wind up on the street.
Our government imagines that if it erodes mental health services quietly enough, no one will notice their disappearance. But the fact is the problem will resurface elsewhere, in a much more serious form.
© Times Colonist (Victoria) 2007
Posted 23 April 2007 - 10:44 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users