APPROVED Roundhouse Marketplace Use: commercial Address: Esquimalt Road at Sitkum Road Municipality: Victoria Region: Urban core Storeys: 1 |
Learn more about Roundhouse Marketplace on Citified.ca
[Vic West] Roundhouse at Bayview Place | Condos; rentals; hotel; commercial | 2008 plan approved | 2020 plan proposed
#141
Posted 18 March 2011 - 04:14 PM
Robert's brother Nat, owns bosa developments which is the company that builds in california as well as a bit in vancouver, but their focus is california.
they are completely seperate companies. the only relationship is that the founders are brothers. they don't do developments together and don't have any investment/cross ownership in one another.
#142
Posted 18 March 2011 - 04:19 PM
The use of the Bosa name for both companies is silly, btw.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#143
Posted 18 March 2011 - 06:13 PM
definitely a bit confusing!
#144
Posted 19 March 2011 - 07:57 AM
Robert Bosa is the founder of bosa properties. colin is robert's son and is now the head of the company
Robert's brother Nat, owns bosa developments which is the company that builds in california as well as a bit in vancouver, but their focus is california.
they are completely seperate companies. the only relationship is that the founders are brothers. they don't do developments together and don't have any investment/cross ownership in one another.
Don't forget Embassay Developments owned by Ryan Bosa which if I remember correctly is Robert's son
#145
Posted 21 September 2011 - 06:44 PM
http://focusequities.../bayview-place/
Image:
http://focusequities...ace_render3.jpg
#146
Posted 21 September 2011 - 07:23 PM
#147
Posted 21 September 2011 - 07:34 PM
#148
Posted 21 September 2011 - 07:36 PM
#149
Posted 21 September 2011 - 07:41 PM
http://focusequities...ace_render3.jpg
Is it just me or is there also something like a tram stop/large covered bus stop along that route?
I suppose a new road could make some sense over by the roundhouse, but it would sure make for an awkward junction at Esquimalt Road.
But a new road makes no sense if it parallels the existing road below the Bayview property.
But one could argue that it also doesn't make much sense to build a retirement residence right beside train tracks.
#150
Posted 21 September 2011 - 07:45 PM
#151
Posted 21 September 2011 - 08:26 PM
But one could argue that it also doesn't make much sense to build a retirement residence right beside train tracks.
Why?
#152
Posted 21 September 2011 - 09:04 PM
Abe: I am very well pleased with this spiffing retirement residence, into which I have just now moved.
(sound of train going by)
Abe: What the...?!? That sounded like a train going by, right outside my window. (thinks for a moment) But surely that isn't possible. Surely it would be regarded as unlawful and immoral in this jurisdiction to allow a train to run in close proximity to such a spiffing retirement residence? Especially since this particular spiffing retirement residence is one into which I have just now moved?
Jasper: A cup of coffee at the marina will take your mind off that.
***
I just hope they aren't thinking of facing that retirement residence building away from the tracks.
#153
Posted 21 September 2011 - 10:08 PM
#154
Posted 22 September 2011 - 05:00 AM
Noise and discomfort though are at times in the eye of the beholder. I will give you another radio show that you might not have thought about.
Bert: Hey Ernie, I hear you bought a new retirement home on the golf course...that must be fantastic?
Ernie: No, it's not. I am selling it.
Bert: Why? It sounds perfect....and you love golf.
Ernie: Golf I love, the golf course....not so much. Lawn mowers going at 6:00 AM, swearing all day, and sprinklers going all night.
Bert: What's with the hard hat?
#155
Posted 22 September 2011 - 06:35 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#156
Posted 22 September 2011 - 06:48 AM
It will be a huge mistake to give up the rail right-of way through the area, and the bigger mistake to not provide for rail over the new bridge to connect with any LRT that is coming into town from the north. The route through Esquimalt could be part of an LRT "loop".
I would hope the developers in the Songhees would be on board to see the rail corridor preserved.
#157
Posted 22 September 2011 - 07:01 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#158
Posted 22 September 2011 - 07:33 AM
For an answer to that you'd need to ask the folks who prepared those images. Although methinks it's possible that they don't even know at this point. We're just reviewing their images and wondering if the grey route represents a road or a cycling path or train tracks or some combination thereof....where would the train be going?
No kidding. But the actual disturbance that the controversial item produces never seems to have much relevance re: the scale of the controversy.What's the fuss? It's not going to be a steam driven freight train.
Correct. If the tracks get cut then the roundhouse is the logical place to terminate the line. But nobody ever blames the city for the city's decisions. It's always some evil developer's fault.We can't fault the developer for accommodating terminus facilities on his property if that's where the train will terminate.
#159
Posted 23 September 2011 - 10:34 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#160
Posted 14 March 2012 - 09:05 AM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users