Jump to content

      












Photo

[Rail] Commuter rail


  • Please log in to reply
2425 replies to this topic

#2421 On the Level

On the Level
  • Member
  • 2,505 posts

Posted 29 April 2021 - 02:26 PM

Sunk costs should be included?  Why?  Rail corridor property acquisition costs, whether for a rail activation or busway are not included.

The Burnside Bridge widening and facilitation with bus lanes is actually less than half of the $40 million.  Since this is not in First Nations land, those consultation costs would be low.

 

Corridor property is already owned regardless of bus or rail, but property acquisition and maintenance is always "free" for BC Transit.  New maintenance facilities downtown, the new site location in View Royal or the expansion of facilities on the Westshore.   Always hidden and never attached to ridership. 

 

I agree however that they need to make a decision and either kill it off and give the land back to First Nations, or move forward.  Given every bus added to the system represents multiple full time union positions, I expect the NDP to kill it.



#2422 On the Level

On the Level
  • Member
  • 2,505 posts

Posted 18 May 2021 - 05:43 PM

So we went for a drive to see how the progress was going for the E&N on the Westshore.   Nice to see the new underpasses.....   :)

 

 

Attached Images

  • Lanford_2021_1_sm2.jpg
  • Lanford_2021_2_sm2.jpg
  • Lanford_2021_3_sm2.jpg


#2423 splashflash

splashflash
  • Member
  • 155 posts

Posted 14 September 2021 - 05:25 PM

https://ckpgtoday.ca...ppeal-rejected/

The BC Supreme Court of Appeal ruled to reject the Snaw-naw-As case but did rule that the Island Corridor Foundation has 18 months to have the railway service reinstated.

"Fisher and Abrioux said in their response there must be a firm timeline for the government to make a decision on the future of the trail."

Hmmm, trail .... Freudian slip?

“Given the comprehensive information now available about the condition of the railway, the work that needs to be done and the projected costs to do so, a period of 18 months from the date of this judgment should be sufficient for Canada to determine whether it will approve funding for infrastructure improvements.”

#2424 Victoria Watcher

Victoria Watcher

    Old White Man On A Canadian Island

  • Member
  • 25,060 posts

Posted 14 September 2021 - 05:30 PM

18 months is indeed enough to do the work. but it would be a bit slapdash to actually get viable rail running for anything other than cosmetic purposes

#2425 Victoria Watcher

Victoria Watcher

    Old White Man On A Canadian Island

  • Member
  • 25,060 posts

Posted 15 September 2021 - 06:34 AM

The E&N used to run between Victoria and Courtenay, with a leg to Parksville. But it has not provided passenger service since 2011 due to the poor condition of its tracks. A remaining section of the line is used for freight traffic out of Nanaimo.

 

 

 

https://www.timescol...-e-n-1.24357958

 

?


Edited by Victoria Watcher, 15 September 2021 - 06:34 AM.


#2426 splashflash

splashflash
  • Member
  • 155 posts

Posted 15 September 2021 - 11:20 AM

https://www.timescol...-e-n-1.24357958
 
?[/size]


Incorrect, and sadly shows the lack of editing of the online newspapers.

From the ruling:
This appeal concerns the grant of a right of way through the reserve lands of the appellant, Snaw-naw-as First Nation, to the E&N Railway Company in 1912. This right of way is part of a rail corridor on Vancouver Island that runs from Victoria to Courtenay, with a branch from Parksville to Port Alberni and a spur from the main line in Nanaimo to a rail yard loading facility. The Snaw-naw-as Reserve lies in the northern segment of the corridor between Nanaimo and Parksville. The respondent, Island Corridor Foundation (ICF), has owned the railway since 2005

 



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users