West Coast Contemporary Architecture
#21
Posted 30 October 2006 - 09:30 AM
Can you explain Glulam?
#22
Posted 30 October 2006 - 10:40 AM
#23
Posted 30 October 2006 - 11:23 AM
#24
Posted 30 October 2006 - 11:35 AM
#25
Posted 30 October 2006 - 11:38 AM
These are great pics. And I do love this style but I am not sure I would want a whole city of them. But 2 or 3 towers in this style would be awesome. I would hazard to say that the new portion of the Monaco lofts fits into this style as well. Granted it is only one floor but it does seem very similar.
I'd say it's not really a style for towers, maybe the podium of a tower. I think it's more likely we'll see this style used outside of downtown areas in houses and lowrise buildings.
This is a style I think we should be building instead of the fake Tuscany of the Tuscany Village currently under construction in Gordon Head. When Saanich got the Tuscany Village proposal, they should have said "uhhh...this isn't Tuscany, this is British Columbia, build something in our own style instead of importing some faux Disneyland style that probably won't age well"
#26
Posted 30 October 2006 - 11:39 AM
#27
Posted 30 October 2006 - 01:01 PM
glulam beams are supposedly better structurewise than steel in a fire, believe it or not.
I've read that too, hard to believe at first, but I suppose steel can bend when it's heated up and under load.
I read that Glulam doesn't catch fire very easily either, even though it's made of wood, must have something to do with all the glue or whatever it's treated with. :smt102
Strong stuff....here's some bridges made with Glulam
#28
Posted 30 October 2006 - 01:20 PM
#29
Posted 30 October 2006 - 01:22 PM
I'd say it's not really a style for towers, maybe the podium of a tower. I think it's more likely we'll see this style used outside of downtown areas in houses and lowrise buildings.
I think something in this style would be an awesome top to a tower, as a penthouse maybe or a restaraunt.
#30
Posted 30 October 2006 - 01:25 PM
#31
Posted 30 October 2006 - 01:29 PM
#32
Posted 30 October 2006 - 01:40 PM
asaying a teacher of mine would say in college with regards to glulam: "narrow and deeper is cheaper"
I don't get it...what does that mean? Is that refering to the dimensions of a beam?
Because narrow and deeper is stronger?
#33
Posted 30 October 2006 - 02:21 PM
#34
Posted 30 October 2006 - 02:48 PM
#35
Posted 30 October 2006 - 03:05 PM
Glulam is also an efficient use of wood since it uses smaller less desireable pieces of wood pressed together to create large beams which otherwise normally would have to come from some old growth forests. If we want to save old growth forests, we should encourage the use of Glulam.
#36
Posted 30 October 2006 - 03:10 PM
asaying a teacher of mine would say in college with regards to glulam: "narrow and deeper is cheaper"
I don't get it...what does that mean? Is that refering to the dimensions of a beam?
Because narrow and deeper is stronger?
yes, dimensions of the beam, as in the beam being made of 2x4 instead of 2x6, and deeper to get enough strength with 2x4s
#37
Posted 30 October 2006 - 03:12 PM
#38
Posted 30 October 2006 - 05:43 PM
I had no idea. I guess you learn something every day. Im looking forwards to seeing more of these glulam buildings, as there are few around.Wood is a sustainable resource, and demand for wood actually ensures that trees are replanted and forests are maintained.
Glulam is also an efficient use of wood since it uses smaller less desireable pieces of wood pressed together to create large beams which otherwise normally would have to come from some old growth forests. If we want to save old growth forests, we should encourage the use of Glulam.
#39
Posted 30 October 2006 - 06:13 PM
#40
Posted 30 October 2006 - 06:16 PM
Doc Sage
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users