Deer issues in Greater Victoria
#41
Posted 15 November 2011 - 12:47 PM
One of the longstanding principles of urban civilization was the separation of the human domain from the wild domain. In the last 40 years or so we seem to have decided that the domains need not be separated after all. Now we're re-learning in a hurry what the benefits were, not just for people but for the animals, too.
Some people seem to think it's wondrous and beautiful to see a pack of raccoons infesting a dumpster behind a supermarket, or to see a cougar stalking an elementary school, or to see coyotes tearing apart a housecat, or to see deer carelessly strolling across a busy intersection. I admit that I have a difficult time grasping the majesty. They're all ugly scenes. That ain't the beauty of nature, folks. That's a mess that we've created.
#42
Posted 15 November 2011 - 05:29 PM
#43
Posted 16 November 2011 - 11:08 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#44
Posted 16 November 2011 - 11:29 AM
The species: http://en.wikipedia....ack-tailed_deer
Hunting techniques: http://www.blacktail...tml/blkpage.htm
Recipes: http://www.venison-m...ml/recipes.html
#45
Posted 16 November 2011 - 12:13 PM
Deer are a large prey animal. Wolves, cougar and people are large predators. Deer were not hanging around the village sites. Deer avoid predators.
When Hudson Bay traders arrived there were no deer populations living and breeding where people were living.
When farmers first tilled Victoria and Saanich land, deer were so uncommon they were greeted with excitement and people wrote about seeing them.
So sure, our deer our native to Van Isle but they arent "natural" in an urban setting. There should be no deer in Fernwood or Rockland. (Sooke? I don't know)
A cull is the correct answer to the deer question. And the answer that Nature requires.
#46
Posted 17 November 2011 - 10:24 AM
#47
Posted 20 February 2012 - 09:09 AM
#48
Posted 20 February 2012 - 11:38 PM
When The Ice retreated and uncovered the lower part of this island The People arrived and occupied the shoreland.
Deer are a large prey animal. Wolves, cougar and people are large predators. Deer were not hanging around the village sites. Deer avoid predators.
When Hudson Bay traders arrived there were no deer populations living and breeding where people were living.
When farmers first tilled Victoria and Saanich land, deer were so uncommon they were greeted with excitement and people wrote about seeing them.
So sure, our deer our native to Van Isle but they arent "natural" in an urban setting. There should be no deer in Fernwood or Rockland. (Sooke? I don't know)
A cull is the correct answer to the deer question. And the answer that Nature requires.
well since the natural home of the deer is being replaced by urban expansion and its natural predators killed off, where would u suggest the deer go? the problem isnt the deer, its us.
#49
Posted 20 February 2012 - 11:59 PM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#50
Posted 21 February 2012 - 12:19 AM
#51
Posted 21 February 2012 - 01:05 AM
One of the longstanding principles of urban civilization was the separation of the human domain from the wild domain. In the last 40 years or so we seem to have decided that the domains need not be separated after all. Now we're re-learning in a hurry what the benefits were, not just for people but for the animals, too.
I don't know where you got the idea that clashes between man and beast only arose in the last 40 years or so but i'm pretty sure that tension has existed as long as we've shared the planet.
Rather than spending 200k on a study that local government will probably ignore anyway, how about we take that money to tranquilize the deer, load them in trucks and drive them up island? 200k would pay for a lot of tranquilizer darts and gas.
#52
Posted 21 February 2012 - 06:50 AM
I don't know where you got the idea that clashes between man and beast only arose in the last 40 years or so but i'm pretty sure that tension has existed as long as we've shared the planet.
Rather than spending 200k on a study that local government will probably ignore anyway, how about we take that money to tranquilize the deer, load them in trucks and drive them up island? 200k would pay for a lot of tranquilizer darts and gas.
Or we can stop killing the deer's natural predators and building in their food supply areas (unlikely to happen).
#53
Posted 21 February 2012 - 07:57 AM
Generations of deer that have grown up in our backyards have no idea that there are thousands of hectares of forests that could offer a better lifestyle.
#54
Posted 21 February 2012 - 08:03 AM
One of the longstanding principles of urban civilization was the separation of the human domain from the wild domain. In the last 40 years or so we seem to have decided that the domains need not be separated after all...
I don't know where you got the idea that clashes between man and beast only arose in the last 40 years or so but i'm pretty sure that tension has existed as long as we've shared the planet.
Phil's homework for tonight is to read the top bit again and figure out why the second bit doesn't make any sense as a reply.
#55
Posted 21 February 2012 - 08:50 AM
His idea may have more merit than one would think at first glance.
#56
Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:06 AM
#57
Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:07 AM
Seems the most logical and environmentally friendly thing to do.
- patrick venton likes this
#58
Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:22 AM
Venison Sausage is yum!
#59
Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:46 AM
I always find his responses to be thought-provoking. Especially when I agree with him and he's still arguing with me.
#60
Posted 21 February 2012 - 11:38 AM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Bing (1)