That’s because on Twitter, journalists are becoming advocates.
The problem is, these journalists feel the need to almost universally add the cliche “these opinions are mine” tag to their description, but they will never carry thar over to the pieces they publish. They never openly speak to their biases off Twitter, even though the biases are there.
I feel that news content from people who describe themselves as journalists should be mandatorily co-written by journalists with developed opposite biases. Otherwise all content from journalists who publish their personal opinions on social media and slant their stories accordingly should be considered op-ed advocacy rather than “news.”
I agree, but that would apply to most journalists. On social media as well as those in large media corporations.
Have you checked out the mainstream media over the past few years… it’s just as activist minded as anywhere else. But under the pretense of « truth ». And as part of their activism, they also control what we get to see/hear or not.
At least with social media, a lot of the manipulative narrative that the socialist activists called « journalists » because of WHO they work for sees a bit of daylight and often ends up making the surface (albeit much later).
Many of the great journalists have left their large organizations for that reason and now are free to do amazing journalism - on social media.
Others have been pushed out by the incoming cohort of journalists, -product of our universities - who see their role as activists and influencers rather than simply reporters.
Really interesting book on the NY Times history of misinformation up to now:
https://www.issuewir...698735320744524