I see it as evidence of the importance of maintaining public trust in construction. The Danbrook issue planted a seed in peoples' minds - if something that big can be built so wrong that it's uninhabitable, what else might developers be screwing up on?
Prior to Danbrook it seemed rare for these type of anonymous accusations to go anywhere, but judging by the upvotes and interest in the comments... people now seem less willing to disregard anonymous accusations like that. It shows that Danbrook undermined an entire industry, in a sense.
There were never any accusations against Danbrook, though.
But on the flip side, wouldn’t this building be getting more scrutiny because of Danbrook? I can no longer buy these random, anonymous internet posts claiming issues. I’ve heard so many over the years that have gone nowhere.
Like you’ve got to think, that if random people on the internet are posting things like this, that authorities are checking out the work. Danbrook never had any publicly identified problems. It was a design that wasn’t to code, right? Here, it’s not the design, it’s the workmanship, I think?