Jump to content

      



























Photo

Non-City of Victoria projects with no threads


  • Please log in to reply
1366 replies to this topic

#1361 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 77,237 posts

Posted 18 May 2023 - 11:31 AM

Yeah, View Royal has made a serious mess of that intersection.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#1362 AllseeingEye

AllseeingEye

    AllSeeingEye

  • Member
  • 6,102 posts
  • LocationGorge-Selkirk

Posted 18 May 2023 - 11:45 AM

They better have a traffic plan; I was at VGH last week and traffic is a s*** show out there as it is.....



#1363 Victoria Watcher

Victoria Watcher

    Old White Man On A Canadian Island

  • Member
  • 42,578 posts

Posted 18 May 2023 - 11:47 AM

You mean people aren’t biking to the hospital to see loved ones?

#1364 AllseeingEye

AllseeingEye

    AllSeeingEye

  • Member
  • 6,102 posts
  • LocationGorge-Selkirk

Posted 18 May 2023 - 11:59 AM

/\ Apparently many folks haven't got the "message" yet.... :1954_dancing:



#1365 Citified.ca

Citified.ca
  • Administrator
  • 2,202 posts
  • LocationVictoria, BC

Posted 24 May 2023 - 08:49 AM

Ten-rentals-could-turn-into-61-if-Central-Saanich-proposal-gets-green-light.jpg

A rendering of a four-storey, 61-unit purpose-built rental proposal for 7701 East Saanich Road in Central Saanich. The project is planned with residences in studio through three-bedroom layouts, and if approved, will replace an aging collection of ten townhomes.

 

Citified profile: https://victoria.cit...t-saanich-road/

 

Ten rentals could turn into 61 if Central Saanich proposal gets green light


  • Nparker and NinVic like this
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.

#1366 Victoria Watcher

Victoria Watcher

    Old White Man On A Canadian Island

  • Member
  • 42,578 posts

Posted Today, 06:07 PM

Saanich council has given initial approval to a rezoning and development application for a nine-unit townhouse project on two lots currently home to single-family homes off Shelbourne Street.

 

The Abstract Developments project, which will see nine three-storey townhomes built at 1661 and 1663 Freeman Ave., won’t go through a public hearing.

 

Coun. Karen Harper said the townhouses are “absolutely consistent with” the Shelbourne Valley action plan, created through a more than an eight-year public engagement process.

“I do believe in public engagement, but I also believe that once we’ve had that public engagement, we should acknowledge it. And the plan is in place now. And these townhomes are part of that plan.”

 

________________

 

The only councillor to vote against the initial approval was Nathalie Chambers, who argued that just because a projects fits within the OCP doesn’t mean it should avoid a public hearing.

Coun. Colin Plant noted the public could still have its say on the project when it comes back to council for first reading.

 

“If residents in the chamber and residents watching online feel that we’ve made a mistake and that this should have a public hearing, send us correspondence, reach out to us, call us,” he said. “I don’t think it’s accurate to say that we are trying to shut people out from the chambers.”

 

 

https://www.timescol...lbourne-7113623

 

 

 

screenshot-www.google.com-2023.06.07-22_08_20.png

 


Edited by Victoria Watcher, Today, 06:09 PM.


#1367 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 36,858 posts

Posted Today, 06:59 PM

...I don’t think it’s accurate to say that we are trying to shut people out from the chambers....

Then schedule a public hearing.



 



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users