[Downtown Victoria] The Falls condo | 54m | 18- & 13-storeys | Built - completed in Aug 2009
#41
Posted 14 October 2006 - 09:43 PM
First, The building is of decent height and definatly looks nice, for replacing a parking lot!
and Second, Mayor Alan Lowe was optimistic about higher-density areas, which birth skyscrapers!
Ben
#42
Posted 23 October 2006 - 12:39 AM
#43
Posted 23 October 2006 - 08:37 AM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#44
Posted 23 October 2006 - 11:31 AM
#45
Posted 23 October 2006 - 11:39 AM
#46
Posted 23 October 2006 - 11:40 AM
#47
Posted 23 October 2006 - 11:44 AM
Basically I chastised the powers that be for being bent on reducing the creativeness of architects and planners in order to appease arbitrary sight lines and extend homage to buildings many Victoria's consider less than desireable architectural focal points (Chateau Vic or the Davis buildings, for example).
I think this is one of the only cities in North America that has architects standing on the podium defending themselves for creating a (get this) project that is "too" good and "too" creative. "It's not right for Victoria," the peanut gallery quibbles. Or my favourite, "This design belongs in Vancouver!"
The response from architects? "I'm sorry, I'll get right on it and design a non-descript box that can stand beside other non-descript boxes. Oh, and I promise to make it shorter then existing non-descript boxes so Victoria can maintain a non-descript architectural presence (aside from the Legislature and Empress, of course) from non-descript vantange points around the harbour."
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#48
Posted 23 October 2006 - 07:48 PM
Pure flow beautiful
A study of glass and sky
Listen (waterfalls)
#49
Posted 23 October 2006 - 07:55 PM
olson brothers are angry
lawyers are busy
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#50
Posted 23 October 2006 - 08:30 PM
#51
Posted 23 October 2006 - 08:37 PM
#52
Posted 23 October 2006 - 08:40 PM
I wonder if all the activity in the area might prompt the Millos owners to replace their beat-up windmill?
Council would refuse to give them a permit to change their sign. That'a a heritage beat up windmill.
#53
Posted 23 October 2006 - 09:15 PM
Council would refuse to give them a permit to change their sign. That'a a heritage beat up windmill.
Ah, but if it's heritage, then council should be bending over backward to save it. I can hear Pam now.....
#54
Posted 23 October 2006 - 09:21 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#55
Posted 23 October 2006 - 09:26 PM
#56
Posted 23 October 2006 - 09:39 PM
She basically said, this is the first time My clients have seen this proposal and they are outraged....yada yada yada yada......
You know what.....Where were you at the first public hearing.....Where were you at the open house at the bottom of the Emperess.....Where were you when the first public hearing was cancelled due to lawyer B.S. and it was written in the paper......
Just udder B.S. ....unreal. :roll:
#57
Posted 23 October 2006 - 10:05 PM
Just udder B.S. ....unreal. :roll:
you might find this handy in the future Scaper
#58
Posted 23 October 2006 - 10:11 PM
I had no idea about the complaint from Millos. One summer I did a stint of janitorial and that restaurant was one of the places I cleaned (also the Maritime Museum -- I got to run the elevator.).
#59
Posted 23 October 2006 - 10:15 PM
#60
Posted 31 October 2006 - 10:23 AM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users