Jump to content

      



























Photo

Alberta and BC politics


  • Please log in to reply
563 replies to this topic

#61 todd

todd
  • Member
  • 12,969 posts

Posted 08 February 2018 - 01:50 PM

Northern Gateway was rejected. Not going to happen. 

 

Makes no sense to ban oil traffic on the northern end, let's put all the tankers in the population/economic center… great idea



#62 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 87,356 posts

Posted 08 February 2018 - 03:33 PM

Alaskan panhandle?

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#63 rjag

rjag
  • Member
  • 6,364 posts
  • LocationSi vis pacem para bellum

Posted 08 February 2018 - 03:34 PM

Alaskan panhandle?

 

http://business.fina...-town-in-alaska

 

 

 

A First Nations’ led $17-billion project to build an oil pipeline from Alberta to the West Coast has put in motion a back-up plan to site its terminal across the border in Alaska to get around an imminent oil tanker ban in British Columbia’s northern coast.


#64 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 87,356 posts

Posted 08 February 2018 - 05:56 PM

Lol, ok then.

This could turn out to be comedic gold, but at our expense.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#65 LJ

LJ
  • Member
  • 13,408 posts

Posted 08 February 2018 - 07:20 PM

Screw the pipeline, just increase the number of rail cars carrying bitumen exponentially, politics be damned.


  • VicHockeyFan likes this
Life's a journey......so roll down the window and enjoy the breeze.

#66 tjv

tjv
  • Member
  • 2,403 posts

Posted 09 February 2018 - 09:56 AM

Any idea where those refineries in Washington State get the crude they refine? I wonder if the oil just bubbles up from under the ground at Cherry Point...it couldn't possibly process crude that's delivered via ocean tanker from Alaska, pipeline from Alberta and rail from Alberta and North Dakota...

Here is the map at to where WA state gets its crude from.  I don't see any pipelines coming from Alberta

 

Again, just an empty threat from Alberta, just increase the flow from WA state and stop all Alberta products destined for BC or our ports.  Time to play hardball, we hold all the cards

Attached Images

  • ScreenHunter_239-Dec.-04-10.18.jpg


#67 jonny

jonny
  • Member
  • 9,211 posts

Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:03 AM

Odd that your unreferenced schematic does not note the laden crude tankers bringing in crude from Alaska right off the coast of Vancouver Island. Odd. 

 

Anyway, we (BC) hold none of the cards. Pipelines are federal jurisdiction. 

 

As Catherine McKenna said yesterday in Question Period regarding KM TMX:

- It is in the National Interest

- Feds clearly have jurisdiction

- The project is going forward


Edited by jonny, 09 February 2018 - 10:06 AM.

  • rjag likes this

#68 jonny

jonny
  • Member
  • 9,211 posts

Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:06 AM

Oh, how did I almost forget this. 

 

 

 

In operation since 1954, the Puget Sound pipeline system ships Canadian crude oil products via the Trans Mountain pipeline system from Abbotsford, British Columbia, for delivery to Washington State refineries in Anacortes, Cherry Point and Ferndale.

 

https://www.kindermo...uget_sound.aspx


  • rjag likes this

#69 Jackerbie

Jackerbie
  • Member
  • 3,776 posts
  • LocationRichmond, BC

Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:07 AM

Here is the map at to where WA state gets its crude from.  I don't see any pipelines coming from Alberta

 

Again, just an empty threat from Alberta, just increase the flow from WA state and stop all Alberta products destined for BC or our ports.  Time to play hardball, we hold all the cards

 

The graphic is from 2013, and it is in reference to refined products, not crude oil. The same website has this information for the source of crude oil, with 26% coming from Alberta via the existing Trans Mountain pipeline, which forks in Sumas to supply refineries in Anacrotes and Ferndale.

 

ScreenHunter_241-Dec.-04-10.19-563x287.j


  • rjag and jonny like this

#70 Jackerbie

Jackerbie
  • Member
  • 3,776 posts
  • LocationRichmond, BC

Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:10 AM

For reference, here's a map of the existing Trans Mountain pipeline, and the proposed twinned sections.

kindermorgan-coast-pipeliine.png



#71 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 87,356 posts

Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:13 AM

There must be a dozen fully laden oil tankers passing through the strait headed from Alaska to Washington.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#72 Jackerbie

Jackerbie
  • Member
  • 3,776 posts
  • LocationRichmond, BC

Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:16 AM

Furthermore, "increase the supply from Washington State" means supporting the transport of crude oil from Alaska through the Strait. There is no "have your cake and eat it too" option here. We either get tankers carrying Canadian goods to market in the Strait, or we get tankers carrying American goods to be sold to Canada through the Strait.


Edited by Jackerbie, 09 February 2018 - 10:16 AM.

  • VicHockeyFan and jonny like this

#73 jonny

jonny
  • Member
  • 9,211 posts

Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:21 AM

There must be a dozen fully laden oil tankers passing through the strait headed from Alaska to Washington.

 

There are literally two passing by right now, according to vesselfinder.com. 



#74 rjag

rjag
  • Member
  • 6,364 posts
  • LocationSi vis pacem para bellum

Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:22 AM

There must be a dozen fully laden oil tankers passing through the strait headed from Alaska to Washington.

 

Right now there are 10 Oil Tankers within 100km of Victoria

 

https://www.marinetr...ery:48.8/zoom:9

 

Zoom it out to encompass all of N.A. and its shocking how few tankers are around us compared to everywhere else.

 

https://www.marinetr...ery:36.5/zoom:4

 

We are being played here folks.



#75 rjag

rjag
  • Member
  • 6,364 posts
  • LocationSi vis pacem para bellum

Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:22 AM

Look at Eu and North Africa

 

https://www.marinetr...ery:38.1/zoom:4



#76 jonny

jonny
  • Member
  • 9,211 posts

Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:25 AM

Yet the narrative is that these super common vessels are ultra dangerous and disasters waiting to happen. 



#77 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 87,356 posts

Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:29 AM

Oops, I meant to say every few days in my post above.

Yes they are a constant sight in our waters.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#78 tjv

tjv
  • Member
  • 2,403 posts

Posted 09 February 2018 - 01:42 PM

For reference, here's a map of the existing Trans Mountain pipeline, and the proposed twinned sections.

kindermorgan-coast-pipeliine.png

ah, interesting, the site I got the schematic from shows nothing about Canada.  Here it is for reference

 

http://www.sightline...s-it-come-from/



#79 rjag

rjag
  • Member
  • 6,364 posts
  • LocationSi vis pacem para bellum

Posted 09 February 2018 - 04:19 PM

Rex nails it yet again

 

http://nationalpost....on-the-oilsands



#80 tjv

tjv
  • Member
  • 2,403 posts

Posted 09 March 2018 - 07:41 AM

Alberta premier threatens to reduce oil shipments amid pipeline dispute with B.C.

https://globalnews.c...-oil-shipments/

 

Time to send the military in?  I don't think she even has the right as those pipelines are owned by corporations, not the province



You're not quite at the end of this discussion topic!

Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
 



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users