Northern Gateway was rejected. Not going to happen.
Makes no sense to ban oil traffic on the northern end, let's put all the tankers in the population/economic center… great idea
Posted 08 February 2018 - 01:50 PM
Northern Gateway was rejected. Not going to happen.
Makes no sense to ban oil traffic on the northern end, let's put all the tankers in the population/economic center… great idea
Posted 08 February 2018 - 03:33 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
Posted 08 February 2018 - 03:34 PM
Alaskan panhandle?
http://business.fina...-town-in-alaska
A First Nations’ led $17-billion project to build an oil pipeline from Alberta to the West Coast has put in motion a back-up plan to site its terminal across the border in Alaska to get around an imminent oil tanker ban in British Columbia’s northern coast.
Posted 08 February 2018 - 05:56 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
Posted 08 February 2018 - 07:20 PM
Screw the pipeline, just increase the number of rail cars carrying bitumen exponentially, politics be damned.
Posted 09 February 2018 - 09:56 AM
Any idea where those refineries in Washington State get the crude they refine? I wonder if the oil just bubbles up from under the ground at Cherry Point...it couldn't possibly process crude that's delivered via ocean tanker from Alaska, pipeline from Alberta and rail from Alberta and North Dakota...
Here is the map at to where WA state gets its crude from. I don't see any pipelines coming from Alberta
Again, just an empty threat from Alberta, just increase the flow from WA state and stop all Alberta products destined for BC or our ports. Time to play hardball, we hold all the cards
Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:03 AM
Odd that your unreferenced schematic does not note the laden crude tankers bringing in crude from Alaska right off the coast of Vancouver Island. Odd.
Anyway, we (BC) hold none of the cards. Pipelines are federal jurisdiction.
As Catherine McKenna said yesterday in Question Period regarding KM TMX:
- It is in the National Interest
- Feds clearly have jurisdiction
- The project is going forward
Edited by jonny, 09 February 2018 - 10:06 AM.
Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:06 AM
Oh, how did I almost forget this.
In operation since 1954, the Puget Sound pipeline system ships Canadian crude oil products via the Trans Mountain pipeline system from Abbotsford, British Columbia, for delivery to Washington State refineries in Anacortes, Cherry Point and Ferndale.
https://www.kindermo...uget_sound.aspx
Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:07 AM
Here is the map at to where WA state gets its crude from. I don't see any pipelines coming from Alberta
Again, just an empty threat from Alberta, just increase the flow from WA state and stop all Alberta products destined for BC or our ports. Time to play hardball, we hold all the cards
The graphic is from 2013, and it is in reference to refined products, not crude oil. The same website has this information for the source of crude oil, with 26% coming from Alberta via the existing Trans Mountain pipeline, which forks in Sumas to supply refineries in Anacrotes and Ferndale.
Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:10 AM
For reference, here's a map of the existing Trans Mountain pipeline, and the proposed twinned sections.
Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:13 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:16 AM
Furthermore, "increase the supply from Washington State" means supporting the transport of crude oil from Alaska through the Strait. There is no "have your cake and eat it too" option here. We either get tankers carrying Canadian goods to market in the Strait, or we get tankers carrying American goods to be sold to Canada through the Strait.
Edited by Jackerbie, 09 February 2018 - 10:16 AM.
Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:21 AM
There must be a dozen fully laden oil tankers passing through the strait headed from Alaska to Washington.
There are literally two passing by right now, according to vesselfinder.com.
Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:22 AM
There must be a dozen fully laden oil tankers passing through the strait headed from Alaska to Washington.
Right now there are 10 Oil Tankers within 100km of Victoria
https://www.marinetr...ery:48.8/zoom:9
Zoom it out to encompass all of N.A. and its shocking how few tankers are around us compared to everywhere else.
https://www.marinetr...ery:36.5/zoom:4
We are being played here folks.
Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:22 AM
Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:25 AM
Yet the narrative is that these super common vessels are ultra dangerous and disasters waiting to happen.
Posted 09 February 2018 - 10:29 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
Posted 09 February 2018 - 01:42 PM
For reference, here's a map of the existing Trans Mountain pipeline, and the proposed twinned sections.
ah, interesting, the site I got the schematic from shows nothing about Canada. Here it is for reference
http://www.sightline...s-it-come-from/
Posted 09 March 2018 - 07:41 AM
https://globalnews.c...-oil-shipments/
Time to send the military in? I don't think she even has the right as those pipelines are owned by corporations, not the province
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users