Earl's | Victoria | Government St. @ View St.
#1
Posted 10 August 2006 - 02:48 PM
#2
Posted 10 August 2006 - 03:15 PM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#3
Posted 10 August 2006 - 05:39 PM
#4
Posted 12 August 2006 - 03:08 PM
#5
Posted 07 September 2006 - 11:36 AM
I will have to try it again when they get their **** together.
#6
Posted 07 September 2006 - 11:42 AM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#7
Posted 07 September 2006 - 11:47 AM
I don't mind C.C.
The food is actually pretty good. And they have that "Ugly" beer there. Mmmm.
(And the waitresses are cuter.)
#8
Posted 07 September 2006 - 12:33 PM
#9
Posted 07 September 2006 - 12:37 PM
#10
Posted 07 September 2006 - 12:44 PM
#11
Posted 19 July 2009 - 10:47 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#12
Posted 10 August 2009 - 02:47 PM
#13
Posted 10 August 2009 - 06:29 PM
#14
Posted 20 October 2011 - 01:33 PM
#15
Posted 20 October 2011 - 11:02 PM
http://www.pssg.gov....mary-report.pdf
Anyways, scroll down to the bottom ("Victoria") and you'll see they are serving their time for an infraction that occurred nearly a year ago, "permitting patron to become intoxicated".
It's a good a time as any to close for some cleaning, cut your labour, etc.
Matt.
#16
Posted 20 October 2011 - 11:06 PM
This is a great site, surprised you did not know of it.
http://www.pssg.gov....mary-report.pdf
Anyways, scroll down to the bottom ("Victoria") and you'll see they are serving their time for an infraction that occurred nearly a year ago, "permitting patron to become intoxicated".
It's a good a time as any to close for some cleaning, cut your labour, etc.
Matt.
Ouch, 8 days. Not just a $10,000 or $15,000 fine, where the owners could deal with it (suffer under it), and all their staff would not lose over a week's pay. I know of no other industry anywhere where they penalize the entire staff for one or two person's mistakes.
#17
Posted 21 October 2011 - 10:41 AM
Matt.
#18
Posted 21 October 2011 - 10:57 AM
This is a great site, surprised you did not know of it.
http://www.pssg.gov....mary-report.pdf
Anyways, scroll down to the bottom ("Victoria") and you'll see they are serving their time for an infraction that occurred nearly a year ago, "permitting patron to become intoxicated".
It's a good a time as any to close for some cleaning, cut your labour, etc.
Matt.
I'm a bit surprised I didn't know about this, either. Thanks for the link! As for earls, chances are this wasn't their first warning (given the gravity of the sanction).
#19
Posted 21 October 2011 - 11:13 AM
Really, they are penalizing the business. They could choose to keep the staff on if they wanted to, closed or not.
Matt.
Correct. I am sure that the $10K or $15K that VHF suggests would cover a good portion of staff wages for a week.
#20
Posted 26 March 2012 - 06:57 AM
A complaint has been filed with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (BCHRT) against Earls Restaurant Ltd. on behalf of all persons in British Columbia with the genetic condition known as albinism (sometimes referred to as “albinos”).
The complaint alleges that
-Earls has discriminated against persons with albinism by marketing and selling Albino Rhino Beer and Albino Chicken Wings to the public at its restaurants.
-The marketing and selling of the Earls Albino products is demeaning to persons with albinism and promotes demeaning behaviour towards them.
-It is humiliating for persons with albinism to patronize the company’s restaurants while other customers around them are ordering these products by simply asking for “an albino.”
-City of Victoria website, 2009
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users